My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02131995 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
1990 s
>
1995
>
02131995 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2007 4:15:05 PM
Creation date
12/1/2003 12:50:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
2/13/1995
Volume Book
117
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> 165 <br />Regular Meeting February 13, 1995 Page 7 <br />Mr. Moore moved for adoption of the Ordinance on third and final <br />reading and Mr. Guerra seconded the motion. Mayor Morris moved to <br />amend the Ordinance in Section 6-3(d) on Page 2 to read, "(d) The <br />price of each cemetery lot and mausoleum crypt is set by separate <br />ordinance. In addition, a perpetual care fee will be charged for <br />each lot and mausoleum crypt in the cemetery, except in the Dixon <br />Addition, section I [deletion]. Perpetual care fees are set by <br />separate ordinance on a scale depending on the number of spaces <br />purchased at one time," and section 6-12(a) and (b) on Page 6 as <br />follows, If (a) The city is the permanent trustee for perpetual care <br />of the mausoleum and all parts of the cemetery except the Dixon <br />Addition, Section-r-[deletion]," and If(b) Every purchaser of a <br />mausoleum crypt and every purchaser of a lot in the cemetery in all <br />additions except the Dixon Addition, section I [deletion], must pay <br />a perpetual care fee in addition to the payment of the price for the <br />lot. The fee will be in the amount established by separate <br />ordinance," and add just before "Permitting fees" near the top of <br />Page 6, "All mausoleum crypts: $390/space, including $90 perpetual <br />care cost," and Mr. Moore seconded the motion, which passed <br />unanimously. Mr. Hernandez stated there are citizens who have <br />expressed an interest in being buried next to loved ones who <br />received indigent burial, and he would like to see the City have the <br />flexibility to allow this. Mr. Taylor stated he would suggest some <br />language. The council expressed an interest in being able to make <br />these determinations out of the public forum. Mr. Guerra moved to <br />table the Ordinance to the next meeting and Mr. Cox seconded the <br />motion. On roll call the following vote was recorded: <br /> AYE: Moore, Hart, Morris, Cox, Hernandez. <br /> NAY: Mooney. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />(Mr. Guerra not present to vote on this item). <br />Mayor Morris introduced a report regarding RAM communications <br />Consultants on their assessment of the radio system needs of the <br />city and funding sources identified. Mr. Gilley advised the Council <br />a representative of RAM Communications was present to answer <br />questions of the Council. Chief Kendrick thinks the city is <br />qualified to apply for five channels over a five-year period. The <br />City would have five channels, the School District could apply for <br />one (and be responsible for payment of the channel) and SWT could <br />apply for one (and be responsible for payment of the channel). The <br />total projected cost for channels would be $2.8 million for all <br />partners, with a $2 million up-front cost to the city. Mr. Gilley <br />stated lease/purchase would be an option, and at the end of the <br />lease, the property would be sold to the city (estimated cost <br />6-1/2-7%), certificates of obligation (estimated 5-1/2%), and <br />participation notes (estimated 5.3%). Mayor Morris requested a cost <br />allocation breakdown by funding source (EMS, Police, Fire, Electric <br />utility, Public Works, etc.). The Council stated they would discuss <br />this further in their budget policy workshop. <br />Mayor Morris introduced the City Manager's Report. Mr. Gilley <br />advised the Council there will be two legislative hearings in Austin <br />tomorrow regarding annexations and a requirement of voter approval <br />in the proposed annexed area. It was consensus of Council to oppose <br />this legislation in committee. <br />Mayor Morris introduced the city Attorney's Report. Mr. Taylor had <br />no report at this meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.