Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Regular Meeting January 10, 1994 Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />Mayor Morris introduced for consideration Item 9.C. (2) removed from <br />the consensus agenda, adoption of a Resolution, the caption which <br />was read as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, DECLARING A MORATORIUM ON THE COLLECTION OF INDUSTRIAL <br />WASTE SURCHARGES; ~D PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. Guerra moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Cox seconded l <br />the motion. Mayor Morris stated this is a federal mandate, and the <br />city has chosen to participate in industrial pretreatment. Mr. <br />Moore stated he thought the City must participate in industrial <br />pretreatment and need to extend a hand to those affected by the <br />program. Mr. Hart stated the City does have other options. Mr. <br />Guerra asked Mr. Taylor if the city does not participate in this <br />program, will the City be faced with litigation. Mr. Taylor stated <br />we will be fined until the treasury runs dry. Mayor Morris stated <br />the goal is to control what enters our wastewater system. The <br />Council discussed if it were possible to make the existing process <br />more palatable rather than go to permitting. Mr. Moore asked for an <br />explanation of why some small businesses would need to be permitted. <br />Mr. Boeker gave an example that SWT has four permits and has spent <br />a considerable amount making changes and is tested ~wice a year. <br />Mr. Boeker stated it is his opinion permitting is the only good <br />method to have control. If the city applies for any water or <br />wastewater grants, we would be required to have a surcharge program <br />in place. Mr. Boeker stated the goal is to keep that which is not <br />allowed out of the waste stream. Mayor Morris moved to amend Part 1 <br />of the Resolution to change the moratorium period from thirty days <br />to one hundred twenty days and for the last line of Part 1 to read, <br />" . . . moratorium period will be suspended, and any collected <br />surcharge will be reimbursed," and Mr. Hart seconded the motion, <br />which passed unanimously. The Council directed during the <br />moratorium all affected businesses receive education on the process, <br />how the testing will be conducted and a cost determination made. <br />Mr. Boeker proposed four composite samples be taken over the course <br />of a day at intervals during the period the business is open, that <br />only COD be tested, and the testing days be unannounced. The city <br />would then split the sample with the business so they could have the <br />sample tested elsewhere by a certified company if they chose to. If <br />the sample exceeds a ten percent margin of discrepancy, a third <br />testing would be done, which would be the test that counts. Mayor <br />Morris requested the owner be notified at the time the City arrives <br />for the testing. Mr. Boeker suggested testing be done every two <br />years. He stated if a business has permanent improvements made, <br />they can request retesting. Mr. Hart stated education is needed <br />prior to a cost analysis. Mr. Hart asked how much reliability there <br />is in the testing method. Mr. Gilley stated he did not think the <br />test results with the grab samples are invalid, but the composite <br />sampling will have more accuracy. Mr. Hart stated the city has to <br />have a reasonable and equitable testing method the city and <br />businesses think is. During the one hundred twenty day moratorium, <br />Council directed education, testing and cost be determined, and Mr. <br />Guerra recommended businesses also be allowed to suggest amendments <br />to the Ordinance. Dan Anderson stated he wants equity for all <br />businesses to be tested. Rick Travis stated he wanted to be tested <br />on Mondays because it is a slower day for his business, and for. <br />equitability all should be tested on the same day. Mr. Boeker <br />stated peak time does not make the chemical more apparent, because <br />there is more dilution in the sample. A representative of Jalisco's <br />Cafe asked why homeowners were not included in the testing and was <br />advised residential use has a minor impact.. Bill Haney stated the <br />intent of the program is not to preclude what goes into the <br />wastewater system. He thinks a license would be easier than the <br />sampling and testing. Mayor Morris stated she did not think this <br />would be equitable, and there would be no control on the situation <br />or incentive to clean up. Mr. Haney advised the Council to scrap <br />the data on sampling we have now. He thinks the information is <br />invalid, as we have not documented the chain of custody and the <br />procedures must be documented when a sample is shared. Willie Higgs <br />asked Mr. Boeker how the sample ports are used, and was advised they <br />are pumped out and collected before a sample is taken. He stated <br />