Laserfiche WebLink
<br />59 <br />Regular Meeting August22,1994 Page 6 -- <br />primary target were streets with less than 6" of water at the end of the road. This <br />means for a 10 year storm (10% probability of occurring in any year) is six to seven <br />inches of rain in a 24-hour period. For culverts, there is a 100 year storm, not less <br />than 6" of water over the measure roadways and no more than 12" of water over the <br />residential roadways. A 100 year storm is 10.15" of rain in a 24-hour period. Mayor <br />Morris asked how you measure streets with no curbs. Mr. Oswald stated they establish <br />a cross section and simulate the storm events. Discussion ensued. Mr. Oswald <br />suggested several phases for implementing the plan. Phase I - Storm Sewers would <br />cost approximately $20,059,000 and Culverts would cost $322,000; Phase II - Storm <br />Sewers would cost $4,752,000 and Culverts would cost $123,000 for a total of <br />$25,256,000. In addition the maintenance program would cost $400,000 per year. He <br />stated there were several options for implementing the cost; 1) general fund and <br />stormwater utility funding; 2) general obligation bonds, or stormwater utility revenue <br />bonds for CIP; 3) recommended financing plan with $3/month billing rate for each <br />equivalent residential unit; and 4) transfer of funds from the annual general fund. <br />Discussion ensued. The Council directed Mr. Gilley and Mr. Oswald to present them <br />with a sample rate study on how ERU's would affect the community. <br />Mayor Morris introduced a discussion regarding a provision of wastewater service to <br />Gary Job Corps Center. Mr. Gilley stated the City was being requasted to move <br />forward with the Department of Labor to place Gary Job Corps on our wastewater <br />system and eliminating their current wastewater treatment facility. Mayor Morris stated <br />the Council was in agreement to move forward with the project. Mr. Cox asked if the <br />impact fees could be charged to the Department of Labor. Mr. Gilley agreed that could <br />be a possibility. Mayor Morris asked if the Council was looking at a $1.3 million dollar <br />concept for oversizing. Mr. Boeker stated the $791,229.00 Construction Cost and <br />$565,471.00 Impact Fee Cost belonged to Gary Job Corps and $400,000.00 was for <br />oversizing. Discussion ensued. Mr. Boeker stated Gary Job Corps would like the <br />Council to waive the impact fees to make the project negotiable. The Council agreed <br />they wanted Gary Job Corps on the system; however, they would not waive the impact <br />fees at this time, but it could still be opened for discussion. <br />Mayor Morris introduced a discussion regarding WaterlWastewater Utility Rate Design <br />Study. Lewis McClain stated he would show the proposed utility rates for <br />water/wastewater. He stated the minimum bill for any preferred rate would be the same <br />for all users at $6.89 and a flat rate of $1.85 per one thousand gallons, regardless of <br />the amount of water used. The minimum bill includes 2,000 gallons of water and 2,000 <br />gallons of wastewater. He stated Multi-Units are based on the number of units and <br />there is a sewer volume cap applied through all units. Mr. McClain stated Rural <br />Customers had a rate of $1.25 x urban rate. He stated the proposed rates would be <br />based on the size of the meter. He said the rate would be based on a Non-Peak/Peak <br />monthly billing, peak months being May-October. Mayor Morris asked it the cap on the <br />wastewater only affected the single-family. Mr. McClain stated that was correct. <br />Discussion ensued. Mr. McClain submitted to the Council a table on impact rate <br />increases on single-family residences. Mr. McClain explained how to read the <br />summary analysis of accounts. Discussion ensued. The Council directed the staff to <br />proceed. <br />Mayor Morris introduced the City Manager's Report. Mr. Gilley had no report. Mayor <br />Morris asked what the "x" on the streets were. Mr. Gilley stated they were State <br />surveys. Mayor asked if the census on the signs into the City were put up by the state. <br />Mr. Gilley stated that was correct. Mayor Morris stated since the State's figures differed <br />with the City's figures, could the City change the signs. Mr. Gilley stated the State <br />would not allow us to change their signs; however, we could put up our own signs <br />showing the City's figures. <br />Mayor Morris introduced the City Attorney's Report. Mr. Taylor had no report, <br />