Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Meeting February 10, 1997 Page 7 <br />Collette Duran stated a meeting had been held with a neighborhood group to inform them <br />with technical information. Mr. Guerra asked if the TCCFUI ordinance met the intent and <br />the purpose of the Telecommunications 1996 act. Mr. Taylor stated it did. Mr. John <br />Blocker, Property Manager for Sprint PCS, stated in the Phase I system and the addition <br />which will be Phase II will cover the central part of San Marcos and more of IH 35. Mr. <br />Blocker stated they stay within the legal requirements of all planning and zoning and they <br />go to the cities to find out where the best locations would be that would not only flit the <br />3 planning and zoning aspects of it but also would benefit the City from a financial <br />standpoint. Mr. Blocker stated they wanted to use the Comanche site for Phase II of their <br />system which the City has directed as a good area. Discussion ensued. The Council <br />directed the City Attorney to draft a model ordinance for the City. <br />Mayor Moore introduced for discussion participation in the Austin-San Antonio <br />Corridor Infrastructure Improvement Fund, Inc. in the amount of $12,000.00 and direction <br />to Staff. Mr. Gilley informed the Council that the total was $2 million dollars with the City <br />contributing $12,000. Mr. Mihalkanin asked if this was for the commuter rail alternative <br />route. Ms. Hughson stated it was more for State Highway 130. Mr. Guerra stated he <br />understood it was for work with the state and federal levels for the high speed development <br />of the proposed 135 alternative route and commuter rail service. Mr. Cox stated as citizens <br />he felt the City should participate for its own benefit. Mr. Guerra stated he did not feel the <br />City should contribute. Ms. Hughson stated she was comfortable with contributing less <br />than $12,000 and closer to $5,000. Mayor Moore directed staff to come back with an <br />amount to discuss further and that his suggestion was $10,000 and agrees with Mr. Cox. <br />Mayor Moore introduced for discussion renegotiation of current Solid Waste <br />Collection Contract or direction to Staff to receive Request for Proposals. Mr. Guerra <br />stated he had filed a conflict of interest affidavit with the City Secretary and left during this <br />discussion. Mr. Gilley stated at the last meeting there was discussion about the current <br />status of the contract with BFI for solid waste collection services and the Council needed <br />to direct staff whether or not to renegotiate. Mr. Gilley stated the Council had three <br />options, one was to either allow that contract to roll over and not take any action. Mr. Gilley <br />stated the contract would be for five years. Mr. Gilley stated the second option was to <br />renegotiate the contract with BFI to include some of the items that were discussed in past <br />weeks, and the third option is to give notice to BFI of the City's intent to seek other <br />alternatives. Mr. Gilley stated his recommendation was that it would be through the RFP <br />process if that is the Council choice. Mayor Moore asked if the current contract qualified, <br />and are we satisfied with the services. Mr. Gilley stated that from the staffs prospective <br />BFI clearly qualifies for that service and provides satisfactory services and is pleased with <br />the quality of service and reasonable cost. Mr. Gilley stated from having heard discussion <br />on this matter there does need to be adjustments if we continue to contract with BFI. Mr. <br />Gilley stated that staff recommendation has indicated in the past week they are satisfied <br />with BFI services and would not hesitate to recommend BFI. Mr. Gilley stated it was hard <br />to argue doing RFPs because it allows a greater number of people to participate. Mr. <br />Hernandez stated he felt the Council needed to receive RFPs. Mr. Cox stated that BFI has <br />had this contract since 1983 and has been renewed without renegotiation. Mr. Hart stated <br />it was hard to argue with the RFP process and would have to have more language with <br />renegotiation than RFP process. Mr. Hart stated that if the City staffs renegotiation does <br />not work out, then the City needs to go with the RFP process. Mr. Mihalkanin stated he <br />wants the City to go through the RFP process. Mr. Cox stated the City needed to give BFI <br />notice if the City does not plan to renew contract and if it wants RFPs, and a time period. <br />Mr. Gilley stated the Council would need to give notice before the end of the month and <br />would need to take action soon. Mr. Gilley stated there would be some legal issues to <br />resolve as well. Ms. Hughson stated she was not complaining about BFI, and appreciated <br />the modifications that were submitted by BFI, but her problem was having the same folks <br />getting this contract year after year without any competitive bidding. Ralph Wueller with <br />Texas Disposal Systems stated he was asking the Council to use the RFP system and go <br />out for proposals. Mr. Wueller stated he had never been in an RFP situation where he has <br />not seen the rates go down but he has seen cities get an increase from their current hauler <br />who said they had to have it because of the equipment expenditures they had. Mr.