Laserfiche WebLink
57 <br />Regular Meeting April 8, 1996 - Page 5 <br />AYE: Mooney, Hart, Morris, Guerra, Cox, Hernandez. <br />NAY: None. <br />ABSTAIN: Moore. <br />Mayor Morris introduced for consideration item S. D. (3) removed from the consensus agenda, <br />adoption of a Resolution, the caption which was read as follows: <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, ADOPTING A POLICY ON INFILL DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES AND <br />DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br />Mr. Guerra moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Moore seconded the motion. Mayor <br />Morris stated she thought this was to be a residential infill policy and residential was not stated <br />specifically in the Resolution or the policy. Mr. Hernandez agreed. Mr. Hart stated he did not <br />perceive this policy to be only residential. Mr. Gilley stated he felt the policy was broad enough <br />to cover residential. Mayor Morris suggested the City already had a policy for businesses with the <br />tax abatement agreement and felt residential growth should be given priority in the Resolution and <br />the policy. Mr. Gilley suggested in B. 1. a. to add "... new private property residential <br />improvements." Mr. Hart stated there would be no assistance to infrastructure for small <br />businesses if residential was included in the infill policy. Mr. Gilley stated the City had other ways <br />to assist businesses (i.e., tax abatement, tax increment financing - TIF, C.I.P. ). Mayor Morris <br />moved to amend the Resolution to add "Residential" in the caption " ... policy on residential infill <br />development ..." and in Recitals 2. " ... quality land development residential projects ..." and <br />in Part 1. "The attached Policy on Residential Infill Development Incentives..." and Mr. Mooney <br />seconded the motion. On roll call for the amendment, the following vote was recorded: <br />AYE: Mooney, Morris, Hernandez. <br />NAY: Moore, Hart, Guerra, Cox. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />The motion on the amendment failed. The Council then voted unanimously for adoption of the <br />Resolution. <br />Mayor Morris introduced a report from Albert Sierra regarding the Housing Authority Program. <br />Mr. Sierra stated there were 26 lots through HUD that were all developed and should receive <br />Certificates of Occupancy from the City within the next few days. He stated six homes on Martin <br />Luther King were occupied and could possibly convert to homeowners when the grant closes in <br />September or October 1996. He stated the goal for 1997 was to have all 26 homes owned by the <br />lessees. Mr. Sierra stated there were 6 homes on MLK, 4 on Wallace, 5 on Mill Street, 1 on <br />Roosevelt, 1 on Sherwood, 1 on Candlelight, 1 on Castle Gate and the remaining 7 in Westover. <br />Mr. Sierra stated there was difficulty in qualifying occupants who would be able to become <br />homeowners. He stated qualifications require a family of four with a maximum income of <br />$22,250 and not more than a family of five with an income of $24,250 with one person working. <br />The Council asked about the Housing Authority forming a non-profit. He stated the Housing <br />Authority bought the Langtry and Windmill Apartment buildings; however, they flipped at closing <br />1 with a buyer and made a profit. He said the goal was to start an affordable ownership program <br />and create a Revolving Loan Fund with the non-profit funds. Mr. Guerra asked how much money <br />had been invested since July, 1995. Mr. Sierra stated $711,000 had been invested in T-bills <br />through Nations Bank. The Council advised Mr. Sierra they would like minutes of the Board <br />meetings and would like a report every six months. Mr. Sierra stated he could give presentations <br />in May and November regarding the P.I.L.O.T. report and the annual audit. <br />Mayor Morris introduced the City Manager's Report. Mr. Gilley had no report. <br />Mayor Morris introduced the City Attorney's Report. Mr. Taylor stated the City's conviction was