Laserfiche WebLink
<br />19. <br /> <br />Regular Meeting <br /> <br />June 11, 2001 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />Ms. Hughson left the Chambers during consideration of this matter, because <br />this is in the vicinity of her home. Mr. Mayhew moved for adoption of the <br />Resolution and Ms. Tatum seconded the motion. Mr. Mihalkanin expressed <br />some concern for the need to replace the line on an emergency basis. Mr. <br />Gilley stated it was not a surprise to Staff that the line needed to be <br />replaced, as it has been in the CIP for awhile. Mr. Gilley stated during <br />the construction of the Metropolitan Apartments, the City thought the line <br />was a 12" line, and in reality it was only a 10" line; and that is why it <br />became an emergency. The developer contributed to the cost of replacement <br />of the line. On roll call the following vote was recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: Mihalkanin, Montoya, Chiu, Cox, Mayhew, Tatum. <br /> <br />NAY: None. <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: Hughson. <br /> <br />Mayor Chiu introduced for consideration Item 29 removed from the consent <br />agenda, adoption of a Resolution, the caption which was read as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, <br />APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE <br />DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND SDC FRANKLIN <br />STREET PARTNERS, LTD. FOR THE PROPOSED BISHOP CROSSING SUBDIVISION; <br />AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT ON BEHALF OF <br />THE CITY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Ms. Tatum moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Cox seconded the <br />motion. Mr. Mayhew stated this was the fourth delay and wanted to know if <br />they had planned for rain delays. Hathem Dawlett stated they anticipated <br />rain days but had not planned on 45 rain days. Mr. Dawlett stated the <br />project would be completed by the end of June, but the testing and <br />acceptance would extend that time. He stated there was a lot of delay <br />with rain and they are bearing $200,000 extra costs on this project. Mr. <br />Mayhew asked Mr. Gilley if the City would incur any costs from the delay, <br />and was advised we would not. Ms. Tatum stated there was a large pothole <br />in the middle of Craddock Ave, near Bishop St. that needed to be fixed, <br />and Mr. Dawlett stated it will be repaired during a punch list and was <br />caused by the use of heavy equipment. Mr. Mihalkanin asked if this was <br />the fourth change to the contract, and Mr. Taylor advised the City had <br />requested three changes of the developer, and there had been apparent <br />unanticipated delays. On roll call the following vote was recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: Montoya, Chiu, Cox, Mayhew, Tatum. <br /> <br />NAY: Mihalkanin, Hughson. <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />