My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2019-090/approving and Interlocal Agreement with the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization relating to a Platinum Planning Study to enhance Multimodal Transportation in the City of San Marcos and Capital Area
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2010's
>
2019
>
Res 2019-090/approving and Interlocal Agreement with the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization relating to a Platinum Planning Study to enhance Multimodal Transportation in the City of San Marcos and Capital Area
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2019 12:54:01 PM
Creation date
5/31/2019 2:41:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Agreement
Number
2019-90
Date
5/21/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Capital Area MPO and City of San Marcos Platinum Planning Study <br />• Recommended mobility management solutions to include traffic flow <br />• Proposed changes or additions to the infrastructure design criteria <br />• Cost estimates and funding sources for proposed improvements (separated by <br />implementer(s)) <br />• Draft final fiscal impact analyses <br />• Description of tools and partnerships needed for housing concepts <br />• Proposed Development Code language or zoning map change recommendations; <br />this should include recommendations on parking, consistent with the Vision San <br />Marcos Comprehensive Plan and the San Marcos Downtown Master Plan. <br />• Proposed changes to local and regional thoroughfare maps <br />• Proposed economic development agreement and partnership language (as needed) <br />3.1- Evaluation Categories and Measures of Effectiveness <br />The Consultant shall develop a set of criteria to assist in evaluating each improvement <br />concept. The broad categories of transportation efficacy, safety, VMT, travel times, right-of- <br />way, socio-economic impacts, urban design, health impacts, environmental impacts, <br />pedestrian/bicyclist impacts, and cost effectiveness will be further defined into evaluation <br />criteria. These criteria shall be written so that it may be included in the Capital Area MPO <br />Transportation Improvement Program and Regional Transportation Plan project selection <br />criteria, if so desired. <br />3.2 - Evaluation of Cost -Effectiveness, Impacts, and Priorities <br />The Consultant shall evaluate cost-effectiveness to determine if the improvements cause <br />sufficient user benefits to justify the investment. The Consultant shall evaluate cost <br />effectiveness by determining the monetary benefits associated with the reduction in vehicle <br />delay due to short-term improvements, as well as compare the benefit to the implementation <br />cost. Benefits shall be determined using the results of the peak hour model and converting the <br />hourly delay values to estimated daily and annual delays, which will then be multiplied by an <br />average cost per hour of delay to achieve annual benefits (dollar -value). Projects and policies <br />shall also be evaluated based on the components outlined in Task 3. The Consultant shall <br />develop a prioritized list of projects and policies based on the outcomes of the evaluation. <br />3.3 - Final Report with Recommendations <br />The Consultant shall prepare and deliver a final report at the conclusion of the study. The <br />report will be reviewed by Capital Area staff, the City of San Marcos and the Steering <br />Committee. The report, executive summary, and visuals must be approved by Capital Area <br />MPO before going to print. The report shall include: <br />• Documentation of public and stakeholder input across all project stages, overview of <br />the planning process; existing conditions report, concept plan, and final <br />recommendations/implementation report; <br />• Discussion of any concepts considered but eliminated for not addressing the study <br />goals and objectives; <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.