Laserfiche WebLink
Capital Area MPO and City of San Marcos Platinum Planning Study <br />• Recommended mobility management solutions to include traffic flow <br />• Proposed changes or additions to the infrastructure design criteria <br />• Cost estimates and funding sources for proposed improvements (separated by <br />implementer(s)) <br />• Draft final fiscal impact analyses <br />• Description of tools and partnerships needed for housing concepts <br />• Proposed Development Code language or zoning map change recommendations; <br />this should include recommendations on parking, consistent with the Vision San <br />Marcos Comprehensive Plan and the San Marcos Downtown Master Plan. <br />• Proposed changes to local and regional thoroughfare maps <br />• Proposed economic development agreement and partnership language (as needed) <br />3.1- Evaluation Categories and Measures of Effectiveness <br />The Consultant shall develop a set of criteria to assist in evaluating each improvement <br />concept. The broad categories of transportation efficacy, safety, VMT, travel times, right-of- <br />way, socio-economic impacts, urban design, health impacts, environmental impacts, <br />pedestrian/bicyclist impacts, and cost effectiveness will be further defined into evaluation <br />criteria. These criteria shall be written so that it may be included in the Capital Area MPO <br />Transportation Improvement Program and Regional Transportation Plan project selection <br />criteria, if so desired. <br />3.2 - Evaluation of Cost -Effectiveness, Impacts, and Priorities <br />The Consultant shall evaluate cost-effectiveness to determine if the improvements cause <br />sufficient user benefits to justify the investment. The Consultant shall evaluate cost <br />effectiveness by determining the monetary benefits associated with the reduction in vehicle <br />delay due to short-term improvements, as well as compare the benefit to the implementation <br />cost. Benefits shall be determined using the results of the peak hour model and converting the <br />hourly delay values to estimated daily and annual delays, which will then be multiplied by an <br />average cost per hour of delay to achieve annual benefits (dollar -value). Projects and policies <br />shall also be evaluated based on the components outlined in Task 3. The Consultant shall <br />develop a prioritized list of projects and policies based on the outcomes of the evaluation. <br />3.3 - Final Report with Recommendations <br />The Consultant shall prepare and deliver a final report at the conclusion of the study. The <br />report will be reviewed by Capital Area staff, the City of San Marcos and the Steering <br />Committee. The report, executive summary, and visuals must be approved by Capital Area <br />MPO before going to print. The report shall include: <br />• Documentation of public and stakeholder input across all project stages, overview of <br />the planning process; existing conditions report, concept plan, and final <br />recommendations/implementation report; <br />• Discussion of any concepts considered but eliminated for not addressing the study <br />goals and objectives; <br />15 <br />