Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Regular Meeting <br /> <br />November 26, 2001 <br /> <br />153. <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />budget. Ms. Hughson thought the total amount of CDBG funds were for <br />actual construction. Ms. Hughson asked if this was done as a bid. Mr. <br />Cobb advised RFQs were done, and a member of Community Action was familiar <br />with the work of the firm being recommended. Mr. Cobb advised the City <br />received qualifications from companies. The building has been designed so <br />that it can be built in stages, and then they are hoping future phases can <br />be built through grant and foundation funding. The plans are for all <br />phases, not just phase one. Ms. Tatum stated that depending on future <br />funding sources, what actually happens in the future stages may not occur <br />as planned. Mr. Taylor advised the law prohibits the selection of <br />architectural services by price, and that they must be selected by <br />qualifications. If the top qualified firm is tossed out from <br />consideration, then we can negotiate with the second most qualified firm. <br />Mr. Taylor stated the City can continue to negotiate price and would <br />assume the scope of services would go down if the price goes down. Mr. <br />Mihalkanin asked if a total cost of the building is known, and Mr. Cobb <br />advised he has that information but not with him. Mr. Cobb stated it is <br />in the range of $100 per square foot times 3,000 square foot facility. <br />Ms. Hughson stated she wants to deny this matter until we get more <br />information. Mr. Mihalkanin stated he would be in favor of tabling this <br />matter to get more information from Mr. Cobb and bring this back to the <br />December 10 meeting. Mr. Mihalkanin then moved to table this Resolution <br />to December 10 and Mr. Mayhew seconded the motion, which passed <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />Mayor Chiu introduced for consideration Item 23 removed from the consent <br />agenda, adoption of a Resolution, the caption which was read as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, <br />APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY <br />AND DUNKIN, SEFKO & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PREPARING A LAND DEVELOPMENT <br />CODE; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF <br />OF THE CITY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Ms. Hughson moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Mayhew seconded <br />the motion. Ms. Hughson moved to amend the Contract on Page 4, Section <br />XIII.B. in the first sentence to delete the word "not" in the second line, <br />" .. Planning Consultant's firm have made or agreed to make. .", <br />and Mr. Mihalkanin seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. Mr. <br />Gilley stated the Development Ordinance Task Force provided information <br />regarding growth management. Ms. Hughson stated that the ordinances can <br />be written to be very pro-development or for slower, more managed growth. <br />She expressed concern about what direction the firm has been given and <br />read information to the Council from the proposal regarding direction. <br />Her concern is that the contract calls for four months of work before it <br />comes to Council. She stated that we can move more quickly if we give the <br />direction first. Mr. Mihalkanin stated he would be interested in seeing <br />that direction given by the Council. . Mr. Cox stated since Ms. Hughson <br />and Mr. Mihalkanin served on this Task Force and they have a level of <br />dissatisfaction, that he wants a level of clarity to be reflected in the <br />