Laserfiche WebLink
6 <br />Regular Meeting January 24, 2000 Page 7 <br />should be encouraging people how to vote, even it if were a City bond <br />issue. He wants the Resolution to reflect only the names who are <br />supportive of the Resolution. Mr. Mihalkanin stated the School Board <br />voted four to three to hold the Bond Election, and he does not think it is <br />appropriate for the Council to support this. The Council has never <br />supported a School Bond Issue before and thinks it is inappropriate for <br />the City to intervene in this matter. Ms. Hughson agreed. Mr. Hernandez <br />stated the Council has adopted a Resolution in the past regarding a City <br />matter on the ballot (collective bargaining), and thinks it is appropriate <br />for the Council to support this issue and further stated it is an <br />important issue as a whole for our community. Mr. Hernandez moved to <br />amend to substitute the Resolution with a second Resolution, the caption <br />which reads: <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, <br />EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR QUALITY EDUCATION IN SAN MARCOS AND FOR THE <br />EFFORTS OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SAN MARCOS CONSOLIDATED <br />INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT TO IMPROVE EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS; AND <br />DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br />Mr. Moseley seconded the motion. On roll call the following vote was <br />recorded: <br />AYE: Moore, Moseley, Cox, Hernandez. <br />NAY: Mihalkanin, Hughson, Doiron. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />Mr. Cox stated all the comments made have validity. He stated this is a <br />significant quality of life issue, is tied to economic development and is <br />an issue that affects the entire community. Ms. Hughson moved to table <br />this matter to the second meeting in February and Mr. Doiron seconded the <br />motion. On roll call the following vote was recorded: <br />AYE: Mihalkanin, Hughson, Doiron. <br />NAY: Moore, Moseley, Cox, Hernandez. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />The motion failed. Mr. Doiron moved to amend the Resolution to indicate <br />the four names that were supportive and the three names that were in <br />opposition to the Resolution and Ms. Hughson seconded the motion. On roll <br />call the following vote was recorded: <br />AYE: Mihalkanin, Hughson, Doiron. <br />NAY: Moore, Moseley, Cox, Hernandez. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />The motion failed. On roll call for adoption of the Resolution, the <br />following vote was recorded: <br />AYE: Moore, Moseley, Cox, Hernandez. <br />NAY: Mihalkanin, Hughson, Doiron. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />Mayor Moore introduced for consideration Item 10.D.(6) removed from the <br />consent agenda, adoption of a Resolution, the caption which was read as <br />follows: