Laserfiche WebLink
27. <br />Regular Meeting March 6, 2000 Page 7 <br />THROUGH THE STATE GENERAL SERVICES COMMISSION; AUTHORIZING <br />THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE PURCHASING DOCUMENTS WITH THE <br />STATE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS APPROVING A TEXAS HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM GRANT <br />AGREEMENT WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR A <br />COMPREHENSIVE SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM <br />APPROVING THE CONTRIBUTION OF MATCHING FUNDS BY THE CITY; <br />AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT AND <br />RELATED DOCUMENTS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br />Item 10.D(11), adoption of a Resolution failed. The caption reads as follows: <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN INTERLOCAL <br />AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN <br />PLANNING ORGANIZATION FOR A PEER REVIEW STUDY OF <br />TRANSPORTATION PLANNING IN THE AUSTIN METROPOLITAN AREA; <br />AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON <br />BEHALF OF THE CITY AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br />Mayor Moore introduced for consideration, Item 10.1)(2), adoption of a Resolution, removed <br />from the consent agenda, the caption which was read as follows: <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE RECLAIMED WATER PUMP <br />STATION PROJECT TO BRYAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY; AUTHORIZING <br />THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ON <br />BEHALF OF THE CITY AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br />Mr. Mihalkanin moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Doiron seconded the motion. Mr. <br />Hernandez asked if Freese and Nichols was the engineer? Ms. Huffman stated she thought Black <br />and Veatch was the engineer. Mr. Hernandez stated his concern with Bryan Construction <br />regarding the odor in the neighborhood near the Treatment Plant. Ms. Huffman stated that the <br />biofilters were added later and was not part of the original design. The Council then voted <br />unanimously for adoption of the Resolution. <br />Mayor Moore introduced for consideration, Item 10.13(7), adoption of a Resolution, removed <br />from the consent agenda, the caption which was read as follows: <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE EASTSIDE INTERCEPTOR PHASE <br />II AND 11135 RELIEF SEWER EXTENSION PROJECT TO HEYL CONSTRUCTION, <br />LTD.; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT <br />DOCUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE <br />DATE. <br />Ms. Hughson moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Doiron seconded the motion. Ms. <br />Hughson stated she was glad the City is planning ahead regarding the Shell FoodMart portion of <br />the Eastside Interceptor and asked why this was not done for the Jack-in-the-Box property. Ms. <br />Anderson responded that the Jack-in-the-Box was built prior to finalization of plans for the <br />Eastside Interceptor and the exact line location was not know at the time. Location has now been <br />finalized. That is why the City asked the developer to do the project and the City would <br />reimburse them for the work done. The Council then voted unanimously for adoption of the <br />Resolution. <br />Mayor Moore introduced for consideration, Item 10.1)(10), adoption of a Resolution, removed <br />from the consent agenda, the caption which was read as follows: