Laserfiche WebLink
February 5, 2008 <br />Page 7 <br />regarding solid waste collections and disposal services. Ms. Jamison inquired whether the Council wants trash <br />collection two times or one time per week and whether the contract should be extended or re -bid. Mayor Narvaiz <br />stated she feels for comparable prices the City would have to go to once a week trash collection. Mr. Guerrero <br />stated he supports the once a week trash collection, if the $5 per month for an additional receptacle is omitted. <br />Mr. Jones stated he feels the Council should keep trash collections at two times per week. Mr. Thomaides stated <br />he like twice a week collection, but the cost increase is too steep. He suggested Council going with a once a <br />week collection and then review the contract after a year. Mayor Narvaiz stated with the cost of $5 for an <br />additional cart is still less to have the extra cart than to keep twice a week collection. The Council agreed by <br />consensus to once a week trash service and to negotiate the cost for an additional cart. The City Attorney was <br />instructed to address the language on changing cost structure for CPI. Ms. Jamison provided the Council with an <br />outlined cost for city services. The Council agreed by consensus to leave in -city services and to continue with the <br />current provider. Ms. Jamison stated she needed direction regarding Multi- Family recycling, whether voluntarily <br />participation or mandate by ordinance. Mr. Fraumann stated Multi - family recycling is for different types of <br />materials; corrugated, mixed paper, etc. He stated TDS would come with same truck with recycling at the curb, <br />and have different ones. Mayor Narvaiz and Mr. Guerrero stated they feel this additional cost would be passed <br />on to the renters. Mayor Narvaiz stated with the affordable housing issues and San Marcos this would cause <br />additional hardship to some. Mr. Thomaides stated he is not sure mandatory is the way to go, but it would have <br />significant benefits. Mr. Jones stated he feels this is an issue the city is concerned about, and this is the method <br />we need to take of some of the problems the City is having. The Council agreed by consensus to agendize a <br />public hearing for public comments regarding multi - family collections becoming part of residential collections, <br />and to come back with an additional discussion item so the Council can provide direction to Staff. Ms. Jamison <br />inquired to directions regarding a single drop off center or multiple drop off sites for Recycling. Mr. Thomaides <br />stated San Marcos has a recycling center in town and he feels Council should negotiate with them. The Council <br />agreed by consensus to go out for bids for a recycling contract. Ms. Jamison stated she needs to get direction <br />regarding the Franchise Fee for when Staff begins talking to the commercial and solid waste provider. She stated <br />the City is currently at 5% and if the City went to 10% this would be absorbed in the rates. The Council agreed <br />by consensus to not increase the 5% Franchise Fee. <br />27. Hold a discussion regarding provisions of the San Marcos City Charter that need to be addressed by <br />the Charter Review Commission and direction to Staff. Due to the late hour this Item was moved to the <br />February 19, 2008, City Council Meeting. <br />28. Hold a discussion regarding Legislative initiatives to be presented during trip to NLC March 8 -11, <br />2008 and direction to Staff. Ms. Jamison stated during the NLC March Conference some of the Council <br />Members usually meet with our Senators to discussion a few issues. She inquired to the initiatives the Council <br />would like to discuss. The Council agreed by consensus to present Loop 82 Overpass, Homeland Security <br />Dollars for Training Facility for Fire, Ecosystem Restoration and Airport funding. <br />29. Hold a discussion to remove prohibition of Swimming Ordinance at and around Spring Lake Dam and <br />direction to Staff. Mr. Thomaides stated he contacted the City Attorney regarding a concern with the swimming <br />ordinance. He stated Mr. Cosentino researched and provided him with the ordinance that has a complete and <br />total prohibition as it is written into law. Mr. Cosentino stated the ordinance prohibits entry into the river from <br />the banks. He stated if the Council repeals the ordinance this would still leave some control to the University, so <br />the University can restrict entry from their property. The Council agreed by consensus to bring back amended <br />Swimming Ordinance at Spring Lake Dam removing the prohibition of swimming. <br />