My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02.04.20 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
2020's
>
2020
>
02.04.20 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2020 9:49:06 AM
Creation date
3/31/2020 9:02:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
2/4/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting Minutes February 4, 2020 <br />Bob Holder, spoke on item #5 regarding the proposed contact with TruGreen <br />for the amount of $142,000 for four years. His concern is that we understand <br />the company and know its products and appreciate the effect that the products <br />will have on the ground. The company and products need to be carefully and <br />seriously vetted, he understands that TruGreen offers an organic option, if <br />requested, but not sure if it's out of date. If the organic option is offered does <br />the City plan to request the organic option? Is the organic option alternative <br />really organic? Or is it improvement on the standard option? Again, the <br />company be vetted and the contract be postponed until then. He researched <br />TruGreen recently and was disturbed by what he found on the products. This <br />information is available on Conserve San Marcos Facebook page. The last two <br />postings indicating how the chemicals are banned in other countries and the <br />effects they have on children, animals and microorganisms. <br />Albert Sierra, representative from the San Marcos Housing Authority, spoke <br />on item #12. Res. 2020-28R will allow a letter of no objection for the purposed <br />development of Lantana at Bastrop. The City of San Marcos Housing <br />Authority and other public entities are partners in this development. We want <br />to express our appreciation for your efforts to create affordable housing to the <br />broader population of our City. The established criteria endorsed by the City <br />Council for accepting low income tax housing credit properties in San Marcos <br />complies with current housing policies. Your position allowing a governmental <br />entity like the San Marcos Housing Authority and public corporations to <br />develop a partnership with a private developer assures that a max benefit is <br />created for the City in its efforts for the construction of affordable housing. <br />Specifically, it allows the Housing Authority to maintain and rehab and <br />construct affordable housing for lower income residents of the City. For the <br />people that are at 30% medium income or less it allows for the construction of <br />assisted housing. We the Housing Authority and Board of Commissioners <br />encourage your vote in favor of a letter of no objection for the Lantana on <br />Bastrop. The unit mixed with the property is forty, fifty, sixty and some <br />seventy units the overall blended rate is 56% in area medium income. No other <br />development in our community can currently make this claim. Once again, <br />thank you and it will benefit our community. <br />Mary Beth Harper, stated at the last city council meeting and asked the council <br />to finalize the agreement with the City of Martindale regarding the disputed <br />ETJ area, that San Marcos claims. Martindale incorporated originally in 1982 <br />in the area that is called the Ohnheiser property was added to Martindale ETJ <br />in 1983. In December 2018, San Marcos wanted to annex the land in the <br />Martindale ETJ, but this disagreement has been going on for fourteen months. <br />City of San Marcos Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.