Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 47. <br />Regular Meeting January 28, 2002 Page 12 <br />would require a vote of approval by the citizens to remove the <br />restriction. Mr. Cox asked if this matter had been reviewed by the Parks <br />and Recreation Advisory Board. Another site that had been looked at by <br />the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce located on Cheatham was discussed with <br />the Board. The Board had no problem with this site, but no vote was <br />taken. Mr. Gilley stated Bob Ronson had worked with the Chamber to look <br />at sites and information was distributed to the City departments for <br />review, but he did not think the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board had <br />voted on this particular location. It was determined that the board has <br />not discussed this matter. Mr. Patterson stated the property is probably <br />appropriately zoned, but a River Corridor site plan would need to go <br />before the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Cobb advised the Parks and <br />Recreation Advisory Board would be holding a Special Meeting this week, <br />and Mr. Taylor stated this item could be agendized if posted on emergency. <br />Mr. Mihalkanin stated he would like this matter to be placed on the Parks <br />Board agenda, and it was consensus of Council this be done. Mr. Cobb <br />stated he would see this matter was placed on the agenda. Mr. Taylor <br />stated he would prepare language for the ballot in the event the City <br />Council wants this matter as a part of the Ordinance calling for the May <br />4, 2002 Election. <br />Mayor Chiu introduced a discussion regarding the Board and Commission <br />attendance policy. Ms. Hughson commented on the fact that for some boards <br />committee meetings are a major part of participation and asked if <br />committee meetings should count in any way. She also asked for special <br />consideration when a member misses a meeting called on a date other than <br />the regular meeting date. Mr. Mihalkanin stated there is a need for the <br />Council to consider modifying the policy. He does not think it is right <br />if a member misses three meetings because of medical reasons and gets <br />removed from a board if the member has been active in participation on the <br />board. Mr. Mayhew was interested in the absences being calculated by the <br />fiscal year (October-September) and that organizations who have <br />representative members on boards should be notified when their <br />representative have absences. Mr. Cox stated he does not think absences <br />are an issue as long as a quorum is present to transact the business of <br />the board. Ms. Hughson stated the downfall to absences is those members <br />then have to be brought up to date on information reviewed at the meetings <br />they missed. Mr. Mihalkanin stated with the current attendance policy, <br />four members of the Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB) should be <br />removed, and that would make it difficult for the Board to function, and <br />the Council should make adjustments. Mr. Mayhew pointed out there are <br />actually six members of CVB who have had absences and should be removed <br />under the current policy. Mr. Mayhew stated the Council needs to <br />determine criteria for reappointment of members to boards and pointed out <br />all members of boards are serving in voluntary positions. He stated most <br />members of CVB are involved in many other ways in the community as well. <br />Mr. Mayhew stated he is willing to modify the attendance policy without <br />weakening it. The Council discussed the possibility of only counting <br />attendance at regularly scheduled meetings. Mr. Mihalkanin suggested the <br />Council consider absences over 25% rather than 25%. Mr. Mihalkanin stated <br /> - <br />