My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07.07.20 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
2020's
>
2020
>
07.07.20 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2020 2:54:23 PM
Creation date
8/13/2020 9:02:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
7/7/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting Minutes July 7, 2020 <br />motorist slammed into it and caused a two -car pile-up: (Honestly, how much <br />more evidence is needed here?) Yet as the situation on San Antonio worsens, <br />Belvin Street has effectively become a private drive. In fact, a San Marcos <br />resident was recently ticketed while driving on Belvin simply because he does <br />not live on the street and was not visiting a Belvin St. resident. Why is the city <br />spending resources preventing the rare motorist from driving down an <br />otherwise public street? And where are the SMPD officers ticketing those <br />motorists who simply drive past the barricade at San Antonio and Hunter and <br />instead enter San Antonio from Olive and Pitt Streets? For every motorist <br />nabbed on Belvin, you could stop hundreds on San Antonio. Belvin Street <br />residents have been quick to argue that they've had to absorb local bus traffic <br />from Hopkins. But let's put this in perspective: According to the CARTS bus <br />schedule, only 11 buses travel Belvin daily. That's 11 total vehicle trips in 24 <br />hours. On Friday, we randomly walked out to our front porch to time how <br />long it would take for 11 vehicles to pass our house on San Antonio. The <br />result: 1 minute, 15 seconds. And it wasn't even that busy. We commend our <br />friends on Belvin for their organized and effective lobbying efforts, but the <br />time has come for the city to recognize that San Antonio is also a residential <br />street. In fact, San Antonio is home to more families, more families with <br />children, and a larger collective property tax base. And it experiences more <br />pedestrian and bicycle traffic, which only adds to the potential danger this <br />traffic poses. Please consider more equitable changes to your traffic rerouting <br />plan. We know the traffic has to go somewhere, and we're willing to shoulder <br />our share. San Antonio Street seems a natural for taking inbound detour <br />traffic, and Belvin is the natural choice for outbound traffic. Large trucks can <br />be detoured to Craddock via signage to avoid huge vehicles rolling down either <br />street. Finally, in addition to (but not instead of) rerouting, please consider <br />installing a few speed limit policing signs along any residential street having to <br />accept detour traffic. We know these works for us, and we're sure we're not <br />alone. Thanks for your service. This isn't fun, we know. But the families who <br />live along San Antonio Street need some relief—and a more equitable <br />approach to detour traffic. <br />Randy Polk: <br />Since the start of the current construction on Hopkins St our quiet street, that <br />is a favorite route used by many bicyclists and pedestrians, has become a <br />major vehicle thoroughfare. Despite NOT being an official detour route, San <br />Antonio St. has become more and more busy since the start of the Hopkins <br />construction. Few vehicles adhere to the 30 mile an hour speed limit. Stop <br />signs are cause for 4 and 5 car backups. And since it's a residential street, <br />parked cars cause further backups with vehicles trying to squeeze by with <br />City of San Marcos Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.