Laserfiche WebLink
immediately following the floods, however, the ability to continue providing ongoing funding is very <br />limited. <br />The City does use up to $450,000 from the General Fund budget to provide annual grants to local non- <br />profit organizations that provide services to the low, very low, and homeless population, including <br />support to the three shelters located within the City. The City also utilizes their regular annual CDBG <br />funding to provide public services such as supporting the Hays -Caldwell Women's Center. The City has <br />also provided funding over the past several years to the Southside Community Center for a housing <br />rehabilitation program. This program helps prevent homelessness by ensuring that the owner occupied <br />housing for low and very low income families remains decent, safe, and sanitary. <br />g) Conclusion <br />The pre -flood housing needs in the City centered around the lack of affordable housing. Though few <br />units are lacking plumbing or kitchen facilities, there is a need for minor to moderate housing <br />rehabilitation to prevent further deterioration as well as a need to demolish unsafe/unsound housing, <br />replacing with a safe and code -compliant home where appropriate. The remainder of this section will <br />discuss the unmet need and provide recommendations on the allocation of CDBG-DR funding. <br />2 U, t JJ n r//f"[i e1'Ifr,J c ed <br />a) Damage and Areas of Greatest Impact <br />The majority of the damage occurred within the 100 -year floodplain or right up against the banks of the <br />Blanco and San Marcos Rivers. The Blanco Gardens area, immediately to the South of Interstate 35 and <br />State Hwy 80, had the most claims submitted for insurance payouts, as seen in the map in Appendix A. <br />Over 1,200 properties are in this area alone, and are at continued risk for additional flood impacts. The <br />City is investigating mitigation measures for this area, and this information is described in more detail in <br />the Infrastructure portion of this assessment. Additionally, the majority of the households within the <br />impacted area are well below 50% of AMI, shown by the map in Appendix A. Therefore, any assistance <br />that is rendered within the impacted areas of the City will ultimately serve the LMI populations that HUD <br />has established as needing the greatest assistance. Graphical display of damage areas and impact can be <br />found in Appendix A. <br />b) FEMA Damage Assessment <br />One of the largest and most important tasks of disaster recovery is identifying, documenting, and <br />reporting the costs of all damages incurred by the disaster event. Immediately following a disaster, <br />resources are scarce and expediency and timeliness are critical. However, it is important to identify the <br />impact of those damages to the City and its residents through: <br />• Data collection; <br />• Housing and Business Surveys; and <br />• Planning and initiating housing inspections. <br />Immediately after the flood waters receded, the City, in a joint effort with FEMA, initiated planning to <br />conduct residential damage assessments. The following activities were performed: <br />• Critical data sources were identified in order to calculate estimated damage values; <br />• Geographic Information Systems (GIS) was implemented to map damage assessment; <br />• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Housing Quality Standards were identified <br />as the acceptable minimum standard for health and safety; and <br />Last Updated 3/03/20 Page 16 of 63 <br />