Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Meeting Minutes March 2, 2021 <br />individually land marked buildings will remain subject to review by the HPC; <br />there is no change suggested to that process. Mr. Winter stated there is a map <br />in the code that <br />identifies those that are sensitive sites. All items that have been listed as <br />historic resources are clearly defined as sensitive sites. Mr. Winter addressed <br />concerns regarding the building materials and those only relate to those <br />outside the Historic District. The existing limitations inside the Historic <br />District do not change. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Derrick asked if a Certificate of Appropriate is still required to <br />be approved by the HPC for use of materials. Mr. Winter stated that anything <br />under the purview of the HPC will still required a Certificate of <br />Appropriateness. Mayor Pro Tem Derrick prefers to have any contiguous areas <br />to the Downtown Area that HPC should be required to give a Certificate of <br />Appropriateness for materials. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Derrick would like to change "Design Context is a <br />consideration for improvements in the area." to "Design Context is required <br />for improvements in the area." This would be in the areas continuous to the <br />Downtown Core. <br />Mayor inquired about interest in revising the minimum set back for railing of a <br />rooftop deck from four (4) feet to (10) feet. She noted this is so the railing isn't <br />seen from the street. This would include any structure such as a canopy. This <br />could vary depending on which floor the rooftop amenity is located. Deputy <br />Mayor Pro Tem Scott asked about the intent of this request and if it is for <br />safety or just the visual aspect. Mayor Hughson confirmed this is for the visual <br />effect. There was no consensus to change the recommendation provided in the <br />packet. at this time. <br />Mayor Hughson proposed a change to the section related to the contextual <br />height stepdown, sensitive edge. She would like to include the definition of <br />"sensitive edge". She noted that the definition was in the December version but <br />is missing in the version for approval tonight. "Sensitive Edge" is used multiple <br />times in the document. <br />MOTION TO AMEND: A motion was made by Mayor Hughson, seconded by <br />Council Member Baker, to amend the design manual, Division 6: <br />NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSITIONS, Section 4.3.6.2 Neighborhood Transition <br />Standards, item C by adding a definition for "sensitive edge": The location at <br />which the sensitive site and the property that requires a contextual height <br />City of San Marcos Page 14 <br />