Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Meeting Minutes October 19, 2021 <br />conditions are met. <br />Ms. Mattingly stated that having all items in one place, such as the <br />development agreement, would be her preference. <br />MOTION TO POSTPONE: a motion by Mayor Hughson, seconded by Council <br />Member Gleason to postpone second reading until development agreement can <br />be proposed addressing council concerns. <br />The motion to postpone carried by the following vote: <br />For: 7 - Mayor Pro Tem Derrick, Mayor Hughson, Council Member Baker, Council Member <br />Gonzales, Council Member Garza, Council Member Gleason and Scott <br />Against: 0 <br />MAIN MOTION: to approve Ordinance 2021-87, on the first of two readings, <br />as amended by postponing approval of second reading until development <br />agreement can be proposed addressing council concerns. <br />The motion to approve carried by the following vote: <br />For: 7 - Mayor Pro Tem Derrick, Mayor Hughson, Council Member Baker, Council Member <br />Gonzales, Council Member Garza, Council Member Gleason and Scott <br />Against: 0 <br />11. Receive a Staff presentation and hold a Public Hearing to receive comments for or <br />against Ordinance 2021-88, amending Table 2.1 and Section 2.5.5.3(A)(1) to require <br />posted notice of a Public Hearing before the Historic Preservation Commission <br />regarding a request for a certificate of appropriateness; amending Section 4.5.2.1(N)(2) <br />to eliminate the limitation of allowing only one demolition by neglect case to be <br />considered per quarter; and amending Section 4.5.2.1(N)(3) to require notice by certified <br />mail to the owner of a property being cited for demolition by neglect, including procedural <br />provisions; providing for the repeal of any conflicting provisions; and declaring an <br />effective date; and consider approval of Ordinance 2021-88, on the first of two readings. <br />Shannon Mattingly, Director of Planning and Development Services, provided <br />a presentation regarding the proposed amendments to Post Notice for <br />Certificate of Appropriateness Requests and Demolition by Neglect Changes. <br />Ms. Mattingly provided a summary of amendments as follows: <br />• Posted Notice for Certificate of Appropriateness Requests: update Table 2.1 <br />to clearly show posted notice is required from No to a Yes and add <br />requirement of "posted notice" to Section 2.5.5.3(A)(2) <br />• Demolition by Neglect: remove requirement for only bringing one property <br />under consideration per quarter and add a requirement to send certified mail <br />to property owners when citing a property with Demolition by Neglect <br />City of San Marcos Page 8 <br />