My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2021-246 approving a Development Agreement with HK Baugh Ranch, LLC, HK Riley’s Pointe, LLC, and Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC, to regulate the annexation and future development of approximately 1,142 acres of land
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2020's
>
2021
>
Res 2021-246 approving a Development Agreement with HK Baugh Ranch, LLC, HK Riley’s Pointe, LLC, and Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC, to regulate the annexation and future development of approximately 1,142 acres of land
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2024 3:58:33 PM
Creation date
9/10/2024 3:40:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Approving
Number
2021-246
Date
12/7/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
714
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br /> I <br /> CEDURES <br /> ao � <br /> quality, or buffer zone located outside the Edwards Aquifer professional engineer. Conditions may include a requirement to <br /> recharge or transition zones: prepare or modify a mitigation plan. <br /> 1. Whether the plan is consistent with approved legislative E. No watershed protection plan or qualified watershed protection <br /> applications for the land subject to the plan; plan shall be approved or approved with conditions unless <br /> proper documentation is submitted to the Responsible Official <br /> 2. Whether the plan meets the standards in Chapter 6 (except indicating that all applicable federal, state, and local permits, <br /> as to the components of a mitigation plan for a qualified approvals, and clearances have first been obtained including <br /> watershed protection plan that vary from Chapter 6) and any required floodplain permit under Chapter 39 of the City <br /> Chapter 3,Article 9; Code. <br /> 3. Whether any proposed mitigation plan offsets the impacts Section 2.6.1.5Appeals and Expiration <br /> to water quality resulting from increased development <br /> within a buffer zone or reclamation of water quality and/ A. Appeal <br /> or buffer zone; and <br /> 1. The applicant for either phase of a watershed protection <br /> 4. Whether the plan is consistent with any proposed plan or any interested person within the notification area <br /> clustering or development transfers outside the plan area. may appeal the decision of the Responsible Official to the <br /> (Ord. No. 2020-60, 9-1-2020) Planning and Zoning Commission. <br /> 2. For a qualified watershed protection plan,the decision of <br /> C. Reclaimed Land-Factors. For developments where the Planning and Zoning Commission may be appealed to <br /> reclamation of land within the 100-year floodplain is proposed: the City Council, in accordance with Section 2.8.1.1. <br /> 1. Whether the reclamation concept plat(which is an element B. Expiration.A watershed protection plan (phase 1 and/or phase <br /> of watershed protection plans and qualified watershed 2), is expired in accordance with Section 2.3.5.3 if an active <br /> protection plans when reclamation is proposed) is permit for development of the land is not in place within two (2) <br /> consistent with approved legislative applications for the years of the date of approval of either phase of the plan. <br /> land subject to the plan, including expressly any master <br /> drainage plan elements applicable to the land; <br /> 2. Whether the reclamation concept plat meets the general <br /> standards in Chapter 6(except as to the components of <br /> a mitigation plan for a qualified watershed protection plan <br /> that vary from Chapter 6), Chapter 3,Article 9, and the <br /> City's Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance; <br /> 3. Whether any adverse impacts have been appropriately <br /> mitigated. <br /> (Ord. No. 2020-60,9-1-2020) <br /> D. Conditions.The applicable decision-maker or the City Council <br /> on appeal may attach such conditions to approval of a qualified <br /> watershed protection plan or either phase of a watershed <br /> protection plan as are necessary to assure that the plan meets <br /> water quality standards, based on the recommendation of the <br /> Responsible Official, a qualified geologist,or a Texas-licensed <br /> 2:42 . Amendud:Sepfumber 1.2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.