Laserfiche WebLink
<br />108 <br /> <br />Regular Meeting <br /> <br />October 14, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, APPROVING AN AMENDED CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE <br />SAN MARCOS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF FUNDS <br />COLLECTED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER 26 OF THE SAN <br />MARCOS CODE OF ORDINANCES AND AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 351, <br />TEXAS TAX CODE; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THIS <br />AMENDED CONTRACT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mayor Morris introduced for consideration Item 9.C.(4) removed from <br />the consensus agenda, adoption of a Resolution, the caption which <br />was read as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO <br />THE CITY'S TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT WITH SAN MARCOS FACTORY <br />STORES, LTD.; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE <br />AMENDMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE <br />DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. Moore moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Hernandez <br />seconded the motion. Mayor Morris moved to amend the Agreement on <br />Page 2 to delete the word "deliver" on the 15th line and Mr. Hart <br />seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. The Council voted <br />unanimously for adoption of the Resolution. <br /> <br />Mayor Morris introduced for consideration Item 9.C. (5) removed from <br />the consensus agenda, adoption of a Resolution, the caption which <br />was read as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE OPENING OF ACCOUNTS WITH LIBERTY CAPITAL <br />MARKETS, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF SECURITIES OF THE <br />UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT; AUTHORIZING CERTAIN CITY OFFICIALS TO <br />ACT AS AGENTS OF THE CITY IN DEALING WITH LIBERTY CAPITAL <br />MARKETS, INC.; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. Hart moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Moore seconded <br />the motion. The Council asked why we were opening the account with <br />Liberty, and Mr. White advised the Council the market was better for <br />us. The Council voted unanimously for adoption of the Resolution. <br /> <br />Mayor Morris introduced for consideration award of bid for two <br />custom fire pumpers for the Fire Department. Mr. Guerra moved to <br />award bid to Sutphen Corporation in the amount of $371,236.00 with <br />discounts provided with 25% down with two-truck order plus options <br />from Schedule F of the bid proposal nos. 4 and 7 and Ms. Kissler <br />seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Mayor Morris introduced a discussion regarding the Department of <br />Transportation widening of IH35 in San Marcos. Elizabeth Hilton <br />advised the Council IH35 will be widened into six lanes with two new <br />interchanges - one North of the Blanco River where the proposed San <br />Marcos Loop crosses IH35 and one South of the Blanco River at the <br />main entrance to River Ridge. Ms. Hilton advised the plans are not <br />far along for the project of widening IH35 from Loop 82 to Hwy. 123, <br />and the construction on these two projects would begin about 1995. <br />She stated the plans are completed from Hwy. 123 to the Comal County <br />line putting the crossroads on the ground and the main lanes above <br />at Wonder World and McCarty to improve access in these areas, and <br />this project is scheduled to begin in september, 1992. <br /> <br />Mayor Morris introduced the City Manager's Report. (1) Mr. Gilley <br />stated the SMEU Board recently discussed the Cycle Billing program <br />evaluating the citizens' concerns and were advised most complaints <br />were received from delinquent bill payers. A cycle billing program <br />will provide smoother collection and better customer service. Mr. <br />Guerra stated fixed income citizens are not being addressed. Mr. <br />Gilley stated if the Cycle 1 period ad4s an additional 5 days, it <br />will carryover into the Cycle 2 billing period, and if 5 additional <br />days i$ given only to Cycle 1 billing customers, it would provide an <br />inequity. Mr. Gilley aiso stated if 5 days is added to each Cycle, <br />the present Cycle 3 customers would experience the problem the Cycle <br />