Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Regular Meeting <br /> <br />September 8, 2003 <br /> <br />89. <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />Mr. Thomaides moved for adoption of the Resolution and Ms. Narvaiz <br />seconded the motion. Mr. Thomaides inquired as to the use of luminaires. <br />Mr. O'Leary stated this extension of the contract is for the purchase of <br />light bulbs for street lights. The Council then voted unanimously for <br />adoption of the Resolution. <br /> <br />Mayor Habingreitherintroduced for consideration Item 31, removed from the <br />consent agenda, adoption of a Resolution, the caption which was read as <br />follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, <br />APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN ANTENNA EQUIPMENT GROUND <br />SPACE RENTAL AGREEMENT AND AN ACCESS LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE <br />CITY AND VOICESTREAM PCS II CORPORATION D/B/A T-MOBILE USA, INC., <br />RELATED TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANTENNA EQUIPMENT ON CITY PROPERTY OFF <br />OF THE 200 BLOCK OF CHARLES AUSTIN DRIVE¡ AUTHORIZING THE CITY <br />MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENTS¡ AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Ms. Narvaiz moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Thomaides <br />seconded the motion. Aliyse Krekel, T-Mobile, presented the Council with <br />pictures of the antenna equipment. She stated the pictures show shrubbery <br />and chain link fencing to help hide the equipment. Mr. O'Leary stated the <br />Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has approved this request. The <br />Council then voted unanimously for adoption of the Resolution. <br /> <br />Mayor Habingreither introduced a discussion regarding the revisions to the <br />City Ethics Ordinance proposed by the Ethics Review Commission. Mr. <br />Mihalkanin stated he has some concerns with proposed amendment 4. on the <br />Agenda Request Form. He stated he feels the rest of the proposed <br />amendments are good amendments. Ms. Narvaiz stated she supports the <br />removal of the proposed amendment 4. She stated she also has difficulties <br />with the proposed amendment 2. Mr. Taylor stated he agrees with Ms. <br />Narvaiz on the proposed amendment 2. Mr. Mark Taylor stated the Ethics <br />Review Commission feels if a Council Member has a conflict of interest, <br />then they cannot lobby other Council Members. He stated if a Council <br />Member cannot publicly lobby, then they should not be able to privately <br />lobby either. Mr. Thomaides stated he has a problem with the proposed <br />amendment 4. He also stated he feels the wording in the proposed <br />amendment 1. regarding domestic partners is too vague. Mr. Mihalkanin <br />stated many states have already defined the definition of domestic <br />partners. Mr. Mark Taylor stated the Ethics Review Commission wanted many <br />situations to apply. The Council agreed by consensus to remove the <br />proposed amendments 1. and 2.¡ keep the proposed amendments 3. and 5.¡ and <br />to amend amendment 4. to apply to paid employees only. An Ordinance will <br />be presented to the council at the next meeting to consider these <br />amendments. <br /> <br />Mayor Habingreither introduced a discussion regarding Rio Vista Pool. Mr. <br />O'Leary stated this discussion will be divided into two parts. 1) David <br />Cavagnao, Fountain People, gave a presentation regarding Water Odyssey. <br />