Laserfiche WebLink
will utilize U.S. Geological Survey ("USGS") topographic quadrangle maps to identify potential <br />receiving streams and their anticipated characteristics, in terms of flow conditions, and/or any <br />ponds that appear on the maps. In addition, the Engineer will review available, recent aerial <br />photography to determine whether any new ponds have been created that are not shown on the <br />USGS map. The Engineer may eliminate receiving streams with discharge impediments, such as <br />on-channel ponds from further consideration. <br />1.4.2 Schedule a field reconnaissance trip once the potential receiving streams have been <br />identified. The Engineer will visually inspect potential receiving streams from publicly <br />accessible locations (generally limited to road crossings). At this stage, the Engineer will not <br />pursue rights-of-entry for any of the options. Based on the results of this field reconnaissance <br />trip, the Engineer will develop a default water quality model for the potential receiving streams <br />using generally accepted parameters and best judgment, based on available information. The <br />Engineer anticipates that two models may be required; one for Cottonwood Creek, and possibly <br />one for the San Marcos River and these models may have more than one alternative discharge <br />location. This field reconnaissance is intended to provide a generalized analysis of the potential <br />assimilative capacity of the receiving water and likely discharge quality requirements in terms of <br />biochemical oxygen demand, ammonia-nitrogen, and dissolved oxygen. <br />1.4.3 Once a recommended alternative site is identified and accepted by the City, conduct a <br />second field reconnaissance trip to verify the character of the stream. For this second trip, the <br />Engineer anticipates that the City will be in contact with the landowner to obtain a right-of-entry <br />to observe and take measurements of the stream downstream of the proposed discharge. The <br />Engineer may adjust the default model based on the results of the second reconnaissance trip. In <br />addition, the Engineer will assess the potential for current or future nutrient limits based on the <br />current regulatory framework, as well as anticipated changes to that framework. <br />1.4.4 Provide the City with electronic copies of the following deliverables: <br />a) Technical memorandum documenting potential receiving streams and their associated <br />characteristics; <br />b) Initial reconnaissance trip technical memorandum including findings and <br />recommendations; <br />c) Water quality modeling report documenting receiving water's potential assimilative <br />capacity; and <br />d) Technical memorandum documenting the results of the final reconnaissance trip of <br />recommended site to verify stream conditions. The Engineer may perform additional <br />modeling based on results of this trip. <br />1.5 TASK 5 - ALTERNATIVE SITE IDENTIFICATION <br />The Engineer will: <br />1.5.1 Based on the results of the Alternative Discharge Evaluation and the established <br />minimum criteria, conduct an initial screening of potential sites within an area defined by the <br />W W WTP Site Location Assessment - CH2M Hill <br />5