Laserfiche WebLink
<br />141 <br /> <br />REGULAR MEErING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br />CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, DECEMBER 20, 1976 <br /> <br />Present: <br /> <br />Mayor <br /> <br />Emmie Craddock <br /> <br />Councilmen <br /> <br />Frank T. Arredondo <br />Ted Breihan <br />Robert L. Cavazos <br />John Hansen <br />Kenneth E. Sutton <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />City Manager <br />City Attorney <br />City Secretary <br />Director of Public Works <br />Director of Finance <br />Director of Community Development <br /> <br />James B. Baugh <br />Charles E. Evans <br />Doriss Hambrick <br />William T. Friedrich <br />Earl T. Williams <br />Albert Sierra <br /> <br />Also present: Richard Santellana; Charles Stone; Jake Krauskopf; Terry Roberts; <br />Howard Yeargan; Emmett McCoy; Allyn Gill; John Morrisset; Lem Cox; <br />Thomas A. Harwood; Joe Tokash; Mrs. Belle Frazier; Mrs. Helena Menne; <br />Mr. & Mrs. Lloyd Mutschlechner; Rita Torres; Lawrence Pool; Sheryl <br />Anderson; Thomas J. Williams; Soila Rodriguez; pordon Hyatt; Gordon <br />Thompson; Herbert A. Yarbrough, Jr.; Kathleen Morris; Henry Kyle; <br />Dudley Dobie; Don Laine; David Morrison; Charles Varnell; Jim Alvis; <br />Jerri Martin; Rowe Ray; Gary Bond; Melissa Mil~ecam; and others. <br /> <br />The Mayor called the meeting to order at 7: 30 p.m. <br /> <br />The Minutes of the Regular Meeting held December 13, 1976, were approved on nIDtion <br />of Mr. Cavazos and second of Mr. Sutton. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen moved the reappointment of Allyn Gill; Emmett McCoy, and Howard Yeargan <br />to the Airport Commission. Mr. James seconded the motion, whiclihpassed unanimously. <br />Mr. James commended the Commission for its leadership in securing airport im]?rovementsl <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Mayor opened a public hearing to consider a re~uest for a, change in the zoning <br />of Lots 27, 28, 29 and 30, Block looftthe Zack Williamson Second Addition from <br />"R-l" (single family residential) to "c" (commercial). Lem Cox, owner of the propertYI <br />was present and represented by attorney Thomas A. Harwood. Mr. Cox stated that he <br />needed the zoning change in order to expand his warehouse facilities. He explained <br />that the business had been started prior to the property having been annexed into <br />the city. Mr. Cox said a variance from the Zonipg Board of Adjustment would not be <br />suff,icient to secure financing for the expansion and that the property' could not be <br />sold with 'the "R-l" ioning. Mr. Harwood described petitions which had been submitted I <br />in support of the re~uest. (Petitions both in support of and objection to the change <br />may be found in the official zoning files of the city) Joe Tokash came before the <br />Council to state that the business was a nuisance in the neighborhood since it allowel <br />boxes and packing material to blow onto adjoining property. Other persons owning <br />property in the area .mo objected to the re~uested change on similar grounds were <br />Mr. Belle Frazier, Mrs. Helena Menne and Mr. & Mrs. Lloyd Mutschlechner and Mrs. Rita' <br />Torres. Mr. Mutschlechner purthefr objected to the inade~uacy of the streets for the <br />traffic generated by the business. The Mayor closed the hearing and read an ordinanc <br />having the following caption: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS <br />AMENDING SECTION 3 OF THAT ORDINANCE WHICH REGULATES AND RESTRICTS <br />THE LOCATION AND USE OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES AND LAND, DATED MAY 23, <br />1966 (VOL. 32) BY CHANGING THE ZONING OF LOTS 27, 28, 29 AND 30, <br />BLOCK 1 OF THE ZACK WILLIAMSON SECOND ADDITION, LOCATED AT 500 W. <br />MARLETON, FROM "R-l" (SINGEL FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO "c" (COMMERCIAL). <br /> <br />Mr. Breihan moved the Ordinance be approved on first reading. Mr. Sutton seconded <br />the motion. Mr. Sutton said he felt it was unfair to annex an already existing <br />business into the city and then to restrict it from expansion. Mr. Breihan agreed. <br />The Mayor agreed that it was an unusual situation in that the business exi8ted prior <br />to its annexation, but that spot zoning was not desirable. On roll call, the follow <br />ing vote was recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: Hansen, James, Sutton, Arredondo, Breihan, Cavazos <br />NAY: Craddock. <br />