Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />City of San Marcos <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br />December 27, 1972 <br /> <br />Because of reorganization and assignment of personnel now in <br />process, the City has the opportunity to hire personnel who can handle <br />such matters and to maintain tha City records properly. This problem <br />will become more critical as the City converts to the computer. If <br />input throughout the year is not accurate, even more time will be nec- <br />essary for the auditors to restate the accounting records to reflect <br />proper balances. <br /> <br />Requirements of Bond Ordinances <br /> <br />Ordinances adopted by the City Council authorizing issuances of <br />general obligation bonds and waterworks and sewer system revenue bonds <br />contain very specific provisions for segregating tax and utility revenues <br />into special funds for retirement of bonds and payment of related interest. <br />Revenue bond ordinances require that utility revenues be applied first to <br />operate and maintain the waterworks and sewer system, then to accounts for <br />retirement of semiannual interest and annual principal as well as creation <br />of certain "reserve" funds which have specific minil11Um balances. <br /> <br />During our examination we noted that monthly payments to interest <br />and sinking funds are not being made systematically and that raserve require- <br />ments are not being met. Requirements as disclosed in Note A of the Utility <br />Fund financial statements should be met. <br /> <br />During 1972 the City Council increased utility rates in an effort <br />to provide the funds necessary to fully comply with provisions of bond ordi- <br />nances and to provide adequate working capital for an enterprise with assets <br />totaling nearly $5,000,000. The rate increases were not adequate to solve <br />the fiscal problems of the Utility Fund before the year ended September 30, <br />1972. Review of the results of the rate increases shows that some improve- <br />ment in financial position has resulted; however, serious deficiencies still <br />existed in working capital and in special funds required by the bond ordinances. <br /> <br />Working capital of the Utility Fund has the same definition as for <br />any business enterprise; it is the excess of "current assets" over "current <br />liabilities" as shown in the enterprise's balance sheet. The 1972 audited <br />financial statements include a statement of changes in financial position <br />for the Utility Fund wherein sources of working capital and applications of <br />working capital are shown. This statement (page 15 of the annual audit report) <br />reveals that working capital increased only $41,542 in 1972 even though net <br />income was $82,423. Changes in the components of working capital are detailed <br />in the audited financial statements for 1972; totals for the last two years <br />are as follows: <br /> <br />September 30, <br />1972 <br /> <br />September 30, <br />1971 <br /> <br />$101,330 <br />186,335 <br />($85,005) <br /> <br />Total current assets <br />Total current liabilities <br />Working capital (deficit) <br /> <br />$156,925 <br />200,388 <br />($43,463) <br />