My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01081973 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
1970 s
>
1973
>
01081973 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2008 4:14:09 PM
Creation date
5/7/2008 11:01:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
1/8/1973
Volume Book
41
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />City of San Marcos -2- <br /> <br />December 27, 1972 <br /> <br />C. Cost records <br /> <br />D. Useful lives <br /> <br />E. Asset location <br /> <br />This method of control would provide more accurate allocation of costs <br />to fixed assets, establish better control over supplies and material inventories, <br />and result in a greater degree of compliance with revenue bond ordinances. These <br />problems could be corrected as part of the conversion to electronic data process- <br />ing to provide the City with complete records and full use of the system. <br /> <br />We observed that Council approval for certain capital expenditures was <br />in exactly the amounts of the bids accepted. No provisions were made for possible <br />change orders or contingencies which might affect final acquisition of the fixed <br />assets. We suggest that management in reviewing bids also consider what changes <br />may be required before the contract is completed and recommend to the Council <br />reasonably anticipated amounts for contingencies. In this way, when the Council <br />approves the major expenditure for a capital item, it will provide for minor devi- <br />ations and will not have to reconsider such items in subsequent meetings. <br /> <br />Ad Valorem Taxes <br /> <br />During our examination of tax rolls and related collection records, <br />we noted that tax collections had not been allocated between the General Fund and <br />the Interest and Sinking Fund on a timely basis. <br /> <br />We recommend that taxes receivable be allocated between the General Fund <br />and Interest and Sinking Fund when the taxes are levied. The allocation should. be <br />in accordance with tax rates adopted in the ordinance levying taxes each year. <br />Tax collections should be allocated at least monthly. <br /> <br />Grant Accounting <br /> <br />The City has been the recipient of several grants-in-aid from the <br />federal government during the past several years. During our engagements, we <br />encountered great difficulty with the City's accounting records in the areas of <br />bonded debt, the library grant, urban renewal, and other federal grants. <br /> <br />Such inadequate records and any failure <br />ments might result in loss of funds to the City. <br />of funds which could result from not claiming all <br />nonallowable costs. <br /> <br />to comply with federal require- <br />The City should consider the loss <br />eligible costs or by claiming <br /> <br />Due to these problems, we have necessarily had to prepare substantial <br />adjustments to recorded amounts in order to reflect proper balances. These problems <br />have caused excess time during our audit and have resulted in excess costs to the <br />City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.