Laserfiche WebLink
~ k, <br />KYLF. APTI7 wALKL°f~ <br />- Arxor~.Ews ex Law <br />FxBSr Narzoxav Daxx Avzz.vzxv <br />IiExBx Ci. KnE SAN MAAOOS. TRxAS <br />A..,,xRrM.W Es April 9, 1962 <br />Mr. B. R. Fuller <br />City Manager <br />City of San Marcos <br />San Marcos, Texas <br />Dear Mr. Fuller: <br />At the request of Mr. H, Garland Stokes, I set out excerpts from <br />the statutes and cases pertinent to the question of the right of the <br />mayor to vote on matters coming before the City Council, <br />Two statutes have to be considered in this regard, namely <br />Articles 997 and 1007 of the Texas Statutes. Same are quoted in full <br />for examination.. <br />Article 997: "All ordinances and resolutions adopted by the <br />council shall, before they take effect, be placed in the office of <br />the city secretary; and the mayor shall sign those he approves. Such <br />as he shall not sign, he shall return to the city council with his <br />objections thereto. Upon the return of any ordinance or resolution <br />by the mayor, the vote by which the same was passed shall be recon- <br />sidered. If, after such reconsideration, a majority of the whole <br />number of aldermen agree to pass the same, and enter their votes on <br />the journal of their proceedings, it shall be in force. If the mayor <br />shall neglect to approve or object to any such proceedings for a <br />longer period than three days after the same shall be placed in the <br />secretary's office as aforesaid, the same shall go into effect". <br />Article 1007: "The mayor shall preside at all meetings of the <br />city council, and shall have a casting vote, except in elections. If <br />he and the president pro tem are absent, any alderman may be appointed <br />to preside." <br />Two Texas cases are of help in interpreting said articles, namely, <br />Robinson vs. Hays, Court of Civil Appeals, 62 Southwest °2nd 1007 and City <br />of Centerville vs. Adkinson, Court of Civil Appeals, 291 Southwest 2nd <br />798. <br />