My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07081963 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
1960 s
>
1963
>
07081963 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2008 10:09:27 AM
Creation date
6/23/2008 11:08:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
7/8/1963
Volume Book
27
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I ~-- <br /> <br />IIfJ?( <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />CUll of San ../I1aycos <br />P. o. Box 725 <br /> <br />5<<" ...MarcoB~ c::l'exas <br /> <br />TELEPHONE: Ar~5 Code 512 <br />EXport 2.2417 <br /> <br />10 July 1963 <br /> <br />Hon. City Council of San Marcos, Texas <br /> <br />Dear Sirs: <br /> <br />In regard to the following motion passed on July 8, 1963: <br /> <br />"I move that Mr. FUller, the City Manager, be instructed <br />to personally contact and talk to the former Chief of <br />Police, William Allbright, and see if he wishes the <br />proceedings of a closed meeting in April, 1962, be made <br />public, or not. I will abide by his wishes" <br /> <br />I feel it is my duty and responsibility to veto this action <br />for the following reasons: <br /> <br />:1 <br /> <br />1. The new members of this Council are in complete darkness <br />as to the proceedings of the above mentioned closed meeting. <br /> <br />2. The new members of this Council do not know if the information <br />to be made public is true or false. <br /> <br />3. This Council does not know if the witnesses in the closed <br />session were assured of the secrecy of their testimony. <br /> <br />4. This Council does not know if the witnesses would want their <br />information, given in a closed session, made public. <br /> <br />5. This Council does not know if the information they are being <br />asked to make public might get them, as individuals, in an expensive <br />lawsuit. <br /> <br />6. This Council does not know if the information it is being asked <br />to make public would be in the best interest of the City of San Marcos, <br />and not get the City in an expensive lawsuit. <br /> <br />"I <br /> <br />7. It is apparent that the best interest of the City of San Marcos <br />would not be served by the present Council revealing proceedings of a <br />closed session of a previous Council, as this would question the <br />integrity of the previous Council's action. <br /> <br />8. It is of utmost importance that the citizens of San Marcos haVe <br />complete confidence in their Council, and an honest feeling that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.