08161966 Executive Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

\\s EXECUTIVE SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, AUGUST 16, 1966 Present: Mayor Ellis Serur Aldermen: Caesar A. Damon Herman Korff Mark H, W~ittenberg I City Manager City Secretary Tax Assessor- Co I lector Fiscal Agent Consulting Engine~r W.E. Wolff Dorothy O. Worre I I George C. Reed Gene Rourke Bill Klotz Absent: Aldermen: Joe C. Froh Wi II iam C. Pool Visitors: Members of the Citizens Advisory Committee: R.C. Van Gundy, Chm., Mrs. Buford Wi lIiams, Luciano Flores, jr., Alonzo Hardge, Ismael 'Rosales, Eleazar Salinas and James Tuttle I The Mayor called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and announc- ed it~ purpose as an informal discussion of some of the problems connected with determining the amount of the bond issue to be voted upon, Sept. 27. Mr. Serur introduced members of,the t,tizens Advisory Committee, and mentioned the names of t~o members unable to be present: J~ck Clark and F.M. Mauldin. The Mayor asked the City Manager to take over. Mr. Wo I ff sa i d Consulting Engineer Bi II' Klotz h~d studied the Isom Hale Report on preliminary studies of the City's public works needs. The City's share~f the c6st had been'estimatedat $1,832,000. He asked Mr. Klotz to make further comment. II Mr. Klotz said several en~ineers 1n the firm of Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam had reviewed the Hale Report and had inspected the disposal plant and water facilities. HEssentiallyH, Mr. Klotz said, Hwe are in good agreement with the survey and preliminary p\ansH. He mentioned two points on which he requested authority to make further study. One was the d~sposalplant and one was on the width of Olmos Drive, and the drainage ditch beside it, A change of plan might necessitate the acquisiti~n of more right-of-way by the City, he said. Inth~ disposal matter, Mr. Klotz said further study might result in a saving of money to the City, and cut down on the pollution problem. HI recommend that you ask us to pursue this further andrnake application to the State for a permit for additional dispOsal facilities". ' The City Manager said the main reason for the meeting was to decide what other things the Counci I wished to fncludein the bond issue, so that the total amount of the issue could be determined. Seven items were discussed, with members of the Citizens Advisory Committee participating. Agreement was reached on the needs of the City for at least the next five years which should be included in the bond issue. Listed below are the ite~s, with estimated costs on the City's ,:share: