Laserfiche WebLink
78 <br /> <br />Regular Meeting <br /> <br />June 8, 1981 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Mr. James introduced for consideration a Resolution, the caption <br />which was read as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br />MARCOS, TEXAS, APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT TO DU-MOR EN- <br />TERPRISES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO THE <br />CITY OF SAN MARCOS KNOWN AS THE VICTORY GARDENS PHASE <br />II PROJECT; ACCEPTING SAID IMPROVEMENTS FOR USE BY <br />SAID CITY; AUTHORIZING PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF ONE <br />HUNDRED TWO THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED THIRTY-EIGHT DOL- <br />LARS AND NINETY-TWO CENTS ($102,738.92) TO DU-MOR EN- <br />TERPRISES AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. Cavazos moved to adopt the Resolution and Mrs. Mendez seconded <br />the motion, which passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Mr. James introduced for consideration a Resolution, the caption <br />which was read as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br />MARCOS, TEXAS, APPROVING PAYMENT TO BEELINE ENGINEER- <br />ING IN THE AMOUNT OF FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED TWELVE <br />DOLLARS AND FORTY-NINE CENTS ($4,512.49) FOR ENGINEER- <br />ING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE VICTORY GARDENS <br />PHASE II PROJECT AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. Cavazos moved to adopt the Resolution and Mr. Brown seconded <br />the motion. Mr. James then asked if Council had any discussion on <br />the matter. Mr. Kreczmer noticed a discrepancy between the amount <br />in the Resolution and the invoice submitted from Beeline Engineering. <br />City Attorney Barbara Edwards stated that the Finance Department had <br />recommended deleting a portion of the fee as submitted by Beeline <br />Engineering. A representative of Beeline Engineering disagreed with <br />the deletion. After much discussion Mr. James asked for a motion to <br />table the matter. Mr. Cavazos moved to table the~matter and Mrs. <br />Mendez seconded the motion. On roll call the following vote was <br />recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: Brown, Cavazos, James and Mendez. <br /> <br />NAY: Kreczmer. <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br /> <br />Mr. James announced that this matter would be considered at a Spe- <br />cial Meeting with Staff to be held Wednesday, June 17, 1981 at 5:30 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. James introduced for consideration an Ordinance on first reading, <br />read in its entirety, the caption which follows: <br /> <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br />MARCOS, TEXAS, AMENDING SECTION 33-9 OF THE CODE OF <br />ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, TOi'REQUIRE <br />COMMERCIAL TOWING AND WRECKER SERVICES PARTICIPAT- <br />ING IN THE ROTATING SYSTEM OF NOTIFICATION OPERATED <br />BY THE SAN MARCOS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY TO <br />MAINTAIN SPECIFIED AMOUNTS AND KINDS OF INSURANCE, <br />TO SET REQUIREMENTS FOR INSURANCE POLICIES PROCURED <br />PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE <br />DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. James moved to approve the Ordinance on first reading to get it <br />on the table for discussion and Mr. Cavazos seconded the motion. By <br />unanimous vote of Council the Ordinance was passed on first reading <br />that wreckers on the City's rotating system should carry cargo insur- <br />ance. <br /> <br />After much discussion Mr. James then moved that the Ordinance be amend- <br />ed requiring the wrecker services on the City's rotating system to have <br />a minimum of $1,000.00 cargo insurance rather than $10,000.00 or to file <br />a surety bond in the amount of $1,000.00, and Mr. Cavazos seconded the <br />motion, which passed unanimously. <br /> <br /> <br />