Laserfiche WebLink
1/4/2007 <br />SECTION I - EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS <br />AC 1.50/5190 -6 <br />I.I. OBLIGATION AGAINST GRANTING EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS. Most exclusive rights <br />agreements violate the grant assurances contained in FAA grant agreements or similar obligations in <br />surplus property conveyances. With few exceptions, an airport sponsor is prohibited from granting a <br />right to a single operator for the provision of an aeronautical activity to the exclusion of others. See <br />defmition of exclusive right in Appendix 1. Accordingly, FAA policy prohibits the creation or <br />continuance of exclusive rights agreements at obligated airports where the airport sponsor has <br />received Federal airport development assistance for the airport's improvement or development. This <br />prohibition applies regardless of how the exclusive right was created, whether by express agreement <br />or the imposition of unreasonable minimum standards and /or requirements (inadvertent or otherwise). <br />1.2. AGENCY POLICY. The existence of an exclusive right to conduct any aeronautical activity <br />at an airport limits the usefulness of the airport and deprives the public of the benefits that flow from <br />competitive enterprise. The purpose of the exclusive rights provision as applied to civil aeronautics is <br />to prevent monopolies and combinations in restraint of trade and to promote competition at federally - <br />obligated airports. An exclusive rights violation occurs when the airport sponsor excludes others, <br />either intentionally or unintentionally, from participating in an on- airport aeronautical activity. A <br />prohibited exclusive right can be manifested by an express agreement, unreasonable minimum <br />standards, or by any other means. Significant to understanding the exclusive rights policy, is the <br />recognition that it is the impact of the activity, and not necessarily the airport sponsor's intent, that <br />constitutes an exclusive rights violation. <br />1.3. EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO THE GENERAL RULE. <br />The following paragraphs address exclusive rights violations and certain exceptions to the exclusive <br />rights policy due to circumstances that make an exception necessary. <br />a. Exclusive Rights Violations <br />I. Restrictions Based on Safety and Efficiency. An airport sponsor can deny a prospective <br />aeronautical service provider the right to engage in an on- airport aeronautical activity for reasons of <br />safety and efficiency. A denial based on safety must be based on evidence demonstrating that airport <br />safety will be compromised if the applicant is allowed to engage in the proposed aeronautical activity. <br />Airport sponsors should carefully scrutinize the safety reasons for denying an aeronautical service <br />provider the opportunity to engage in an aeronautical activity if the denial has the possible effect of <br />limiting competition. <br />The FAA is the final authority in determining what, in fact, constitutes a compromise of safety. As <br />such, an airport sponsor that is contemplating the denial of a proposed on- airport aeronautical activity <br />is encouraged to contact the Iocal Airports District Office (ADO) or the Regional Airports Office. <br />Those offices WIII then seek assistance from FAA Flight Standards (FS) and Air Traffic (AT) to <br />assess the reasonableness of the proposed action and whether unjust discrimination results from the <br />proposed restrictions on aeronautical activities because of safety and efficiency. 3 <br />3 Here the word efficiency refers to the efficient use of navigable airspace, an inherent FAA Air Traffic Control function. That <br />is the reason w =hy FAA Air Traffic (AT) is to be consulted in such cases. It is not meant to be an interpretation that could be <br />construed as protecting the "efficient" operation of an existing aeronautical service provider for example. <br />3 <br />