My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2011-055
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Res 2011-055
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2011 4:16:32 PM
Creation date
6/2/2011 3:20:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Approving
Number
2011-55
Date
5/17/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
➢ IBM will bring deep technical expertise and analytics software to create the Analytics Tool, <br />through a contractual relationship with City of Austin. IBM, the Austin Lab and its extended <br />Smarter Cities team will work with the City of Austin, the UT Center for Sustainable <br />Development (UT), and the CATS Consortium to produce a powerful regionally -based software <br />tool to allow for cross - organization analysis as the basis for investments in livable, sustainable <br />communities. <br />Sec. 4. Accountability <br />All parties with responsibility for deliverables at all levels will be signatories to an Interlocal Agreement, <br />Contract as provided for by State law, or an MOU. Only the Interlocal Agreements and Contracts will be <br />legally enforceable; however, those communities executing MOUs for planning and analytical services will <br />need to meet specific milestones to benefit from those services. <br />Financial and Legal Requirements of the HUD Agreement <br />No expenditures shall be made from the proceeds of the grant unless they are outlined in the approved or <br />amended budget; all disbursements shall be made through interlocal agreements, subgrantee contracts, or <br />other documents authorized by CAPCOG policy, and any expenditure over $15,000 shall be approved by <br />the CAPCOG Executive Committee. All signatories of this MOU agree to comply with the requirements <br />contained in the agreement, including the Terms and Conditions established by HUD, as they relate to the <br />intent and scope of the project coinciding with the approved budget. <br />Sec. 5. Governance and Decision - making Protocols <br />Grantee. The Capital Area Council of Governments is the grantee and bears responsibility for financial, <br />legal, and compliance requirements of the grant and its successful implementation. The CAPCOG Executive <br />Committee is the governing body of CAPCOG and as such shall have final authority on all issues if they bear <br />on any of the requirements contained in binding agreements between HUD and CAPCOG. <br />Executive Team shall be composed of CAPCOG, CAMPO, City of Austin, and ECT represented by Betty <br />Voights, Maureen McCoy, Kevin Johns, and Sally Campbell; there will be no substitutions or proxies except <br />in the case that one of these named representatives leaves employment of the agency he /she represents. <br />In that event, the agency shall name a new representative. The Executive Team is charged with making <br />decisions related to HUD compliance and budget, disputes over implementation issues such as contract <br />performance and deliverables, quick turn - around issues, and may override decisions of other committees <br />and partners. <br />Steering Committee shall be composed of representatives of Executive Team members and cities of Round <br />Rock and San Marcos, Cap Metro, and CARTS. Steering Committee members shall each have one primary <br />member and one named proxy. Proxies will be formally designated and cannot change from meeting to <br />meeting. The Steering Committee is intended to be the decision - making body for core aspects of <br />implementation including but not limited to: <br />Adoption of demonstration site goals and criteria. <br />Selection of activity centers for Analytic Test Sites and for Planning Demo Sites. <br />• Approval of the RFP for demo site consultant services and recommendation for the consultant <br />contract. <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.