Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />62. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO 2005- 1 7? R <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />SAN MARCOS, TEXAS APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF CITY <br />WATER AND WASTEWATER MAINS TO SERVE A 3017 <br />ACRE, MORE OR LESS, AREA PROPOSED FOR <br />DEVELOPMENTBYW.F KARAM,INC IN THE 1300 AND 1400 <br />BLOCKS OF CENTERPOINT ROAD, AND DECLARING AN <br />EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />RECITALS <br /> <br />1 CIty Land Development Code SectIOn 2.3 1.2 reqUIres CIty CouncIl approval for the <br />extensIOn of City water or wastewater mams m the CIty'S extraterntonal jUrISdIctIon. <br /> <br />2. W F Karam, Inc. (the "PetitIOner") has submItted a petItIOn to extend CIty water and <br />wastewater mams to serve the 30 17 acre, more or less, tract of property described on the attached <br />ExhibIt A (the "Property"), whIch is m the CIty'S extraterritonal jUrIsdictIOn, to be developed for <br />commercIal uses. <br /> <br />3 The CIty Council finds and determmes that: <br /> <br />(a) The proposed development to be served by the extensIOns appears to be conSIstent with <br />the Master Plan, <br /> <br />(b) The extensIOns are proposed to be constructed m accordance wIth the CIty'S Technical <br />Construction Standards and Specifications, the provIsions of Chapter 86 of the CIty Code, and <br />all other applIcable CIty regulatIOns and standards, <br /> <br />(c) It appears to be feasible to annex the property, and any mtervenmg property WhICh IS <br />needed for utilIty nghts-of-way, to the CIty m a tImely manner; <br /> <br />(d) It appears that the utilIty extensIOns would not compromise the City's ability to tImely <br />provide adequate water or wastewater facilities to property mside the City; <br /> <br />(e) It appears that the utility extensions will not lead to premature development that cannot <br />be served efficiently and tImely by roadway, dramage or park faCIlitIes, <br /> <br />(f) It appears that the utIlIty extensIOns are financIally feasible gIven the PetitIOner s <br />proposed means of financmg the extensIOn, <br /> <br />(g) It appears that the utIlIty extensIOns wIll not lead to sIgmficant degradation of water <br />qualIty or other envIronmental resources, either from constructIOn of the water or wastewater <br />Improvements, development of petItIOner's land, or development of other land that may be served <br />through the extended facilItIes, and <br /> <br />(h) The PetItIOner IS not proposmg to extend CIty wastewater facilIties WIthOUt utilizmg City <br />