Laserfiche WebLink
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program <br />The Aquifer is a unique groundwater resource, extending 180 miles from Brackettville in Kinney <br />County, Texas, to Kyle in Hays County, Texas. (Figure 1-1). It is the primary source of drinking <br />water for over two million people in south-central Texas and serves the domestic, livestock, <br />irrigation, industrial, municipal, and recreational needs of the area. The Aquifer is the source of <br />the two largest springs remaining in Texas -- the San Marcos and the Comal springs. These <br />springs are the headwaters of the San Marcos and Comal rivers, which are tributaries to the <br />Guadalupe River. <br />Eight species that depend directly on water in or discharged from the Aquifer are federally-listed <br />as threatened or endangered. These species include fountain darter (Etheostoma fonticola), <br />San Marcos salamander (Eurycea nana), San Marcos gambusia (Gambusia georgei), Texas <br />blind salamander (Eurycea [formerly Typhlomolge] rathbuni), Peck's cave amphipod <br />(Stygobromus pecki), Comal Springs dryopid beetle (Stygoparnus comalensis), Comal Springs <br />riffle beetle (Heterelmis comalensis), and Texas wild rice (Zizania texana). The primary threat to <br />these Aquifer-dependent species is the intermittent loss of habitat from reduced springflows. <br />Springflow loss is the combined result of naturally fluctuating rainfall patterns, natural <br />discharges at other springs, and regional pumping and drawdown of the Aquifer. <br />In 1991, the Sierra Club filed a lawsuit under the ESA that resulted ultimately in the creation of <br />the EAA. The Texas Legislature directed the EAA to regulate, among other things, pumping <br />from the Aquifer, to implement critical period management restrictions, and to pursue a program <br />to ensure that the continuous minimum springflows of the Comal Springs and the San Marcos <br />Springs are maintained to protect endangered and threatened species to the extent required by <br />federal law . . . . (EAA Act § 1.14(h)). A workable plan for the protection for the federally-listed <br />species has been ers as set out in this HCP. <br />In the fall of 2006, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) brought together <br />stakeholders from throughout the region to participate in a collaborative process to develop a <br />plan to contribute to the recovery of federally listed species dependent on the Aquifer. This <br />process is referred to as the EARIP. In May 2007, the Texas Legislature codified the EARIP in <br />state law and directed the EAA and certain other state agencies, local units of government, and <br />other stakeholders to participate in the EARIP and to prepare a USFWS-approved plan by 2012 <br />for managing the Aquifer to preserve the federally-listed species. The Legislature directed that <br />the plan must include, among other things, recommendations regarding withdrawal adjustments <br />during critical periods that ensure that federally-listed species associated with the Aquifer will be <br /> <br />protected. <br />1.1.3 Legislative Requirements <br />1 <br />In 1993, the Texas Legislature passed the Edwards Aquifer Authority Act (EAA Act) which, <br />among other things, created the EAA. Although the EAA Act was passed in 1993, litigation <br />delayed agency start-up for three years, until 1996. The general intent of the EAA Act was to <br /> <br />1 <br />rd <br /> Act of May 30, 1993, 73 Leg., R.S., ch 626, 1993, Tex. Gen. Laws 2350, as amended. <br /> <br />1-2 <br /> <br />