My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ord 1999-063
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
02 Ordinances
>
1990 s
>
1999
>
Ord 1999-063
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2006 11:48:47 AM
Creation date
7/24/2006 11:48:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Ordinances
City Clerk - Type
Amendment
Number
1999-63
Date
9/11/2000
Volume Book
141
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />228 <br /> <br />CAPITAL AREA RURAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM <br />2010 East Sixth Street. Austin, Texas 78702/ P.O. Box 6050, 78762 <br />512389101 \ Fax 512 478 I I 10 I cartshq@ao\.com <br /> <br />September 11, 2000 <br /> <br />Honorable David Chiu, Mayor <br />Council members Doiron, Moseley, Hughson, Cox, Mayhew and Tatum <br />City of San Marcos <br />630 East Hopkins <br />San Marcos, Texas 78666 <br /> <br />Dear Mayor and Council members: <br /> <br />I am pleased to be here tonight to report on the activities of CARTS in your city and to provide <br />any answers I can to questions you may have. We have made significant progress this year <br />towards our goal of meeting future and current transportation needs in San Marcos with an <br />investment in infrastructure that will serve the city for many years to come and I want to update <br />the council on that. But, I am here tonight in response to concerns expressed about the relative <br />inconvenience of using the San Marcos Transit fixed route services and want to address that <br />matter first. <br /> <br />The SMT is a four bus fixed route that operates eight "paired" routes on 30-minute headways. <br />What this means is that the routes were designed to complement one another with origin routes <br />beginning at the top of the hour that meet destination routes on the half hour at a central transfer <br />point. <br /> <br />Under this type of "pulse" system a passenger could take as long as an hour to get to his or her <br />destination and as long as an hour to get back. Add to this waiting time for the bus at each end <br />and the business conducted at the destination, and the trip could take the better part of half a day. <br />This is not as convenient as it should be. We agree. And if anything goes wrong, a bus breaks <br />down or is late then whatever trip planning the patron has made can go out the window. <br /> <br />Can we improve this situation? Yes, but without an increase in the frequency of buses the <br />improvements necessarily will be in more direct route alignments and perhaps some service <br />routes targeted to specific activity centers, but there are real limitations to a four-bus system. <br /> <br />Can we stop running on fixed routes and just go where people call to say they want to go? Yes, <br />we could do that too, but fewer people would be able to use the system. The high side of this <br />type of service in terms of productivity is 3.5-4.0 trips per hour while fixed routes will produce <br />double that if everything is working right. It would be more convenient if you get the ride, but <br />the capacity would be limited so many current users would not get service. It is also a more <br />expensive service, as it requires someone to take the request and dispatch it to the driver. <br /> <br />ft lT~1 ~J\\ )0 <br />o ~ )\~ GQ Q;Q vtlJ ~\ ~ <br />. rn ) fJ /1\/1~.5. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.