Laserfiche WebLink
<br />38 <br /> <br />regular meeting <br /> <br />june 23, 1980 <br /> <br />page two <br /> <br />Craig Farmer, from Freese & Nichols, Inc., addressed the Council and <br />explained the amendment to the contract. The City Secretary reported <br />that, as a part of the Master Plan Phase II program, the City was <br />entering into an agreement with Southwest Texas State University to <br />produce a video-tape educational program. The City would pay for <br />university expenses incurred in an amount not to exceed $1600. Mrs. <br />Norris moved to approve the Resolution. Mr. James seconded the motion. <br />On roll call, the following vote was recorded: <br /> <br />NAY: None <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />AYE: Brown, James, Kraus, Norris, Stokes <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: Cavazos <br /> <br />The Mayor introduced for consideration an Ordinance on first reading <br />having the following caption: <br /> <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, AMENDING THAT ORDINANCE ADOPTED APRIL 14, 1980 <br />WHICH GRANTED TO RIVER TAXI SERVICE A FRANCHISE FOR ONE <br />YEAR TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A TAXI SERVICE WITHIN THE <br />CORPORATE LIMITS OF SAID CITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRANSPORTING <br />PERSONS USING INNERTUBES ON THE SAN MARCOS RIVER BY DELETING <br />THE REQUIREMENT THAT ANY INSURANCE POLICY PROCURED CONTAIN <br />A WAIVER OF THE SUBROGATION RIGHTS OF THE INSURANCE COMPANY <br />AGAINST CITY; BY REQUIRING INDEMNIFICATION BY SERVICE WHEN <br />CITY HAS CAUSED DAMAGES, CLAIM, LOSS, DEMAND, SUIT, <br />JUDGMENT, COST OR EXPENSE AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. Stokes moved to approve the Ordinance. Mr. James seconded the <br />motion. The Mayor then opened a public hearing. Mr. Vernon Hartman, <br />of the Hartman Insurance Agency, stated that River Taxi Service was <br />requesting not to have to obtain a waiver of subrogation because of I <br />the increase in the cost of insurance coverage for their service. No <br />one else spoke in regards to this request. The Mayor then closed the <br />public hearing. Mr. Brown made a motion to amend Section 2, Section 11 <br />by changing the wording of this section from "in part" to "negligence <br />of City". Mr. James seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. On <br />the original motion to approve the Ordinance, the vote was unanimous for <br />approval. <br /> <br />The Mayor introduced for consideration an Ordinance on first reading <br />having the following caption: <br /> <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br />MARCOS, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 3, ENTITLED "ANIMALS <br />AND FOWLS" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF SAID CITY <br />BY DEFINING CERTAIN TERMS; BY PRESCRIBING REGULATIONS <br />PERTAINING TO VICIOUS DOGS; BY SETTING REQUIREMENTS <br />FOR FEMALE DOGS IN SEASON; BY DESIGNATING PERSONS <br />AUTHORIZED TO IMPOUND DOGS AND SPECIFYING PROCEDURES <br />FOR SUCH IMPOUNDMENT; BY PROHIBITING INTERFERENCE <br />WITH EMPLOYEES ACTING PURSUANT TO THIS CHAPTER; BY <br />PROHIBITING THE KEEPING OF DOGS MAKING SPECIFIED <br />NOISE; BY PRESCRIBING METHODS OF CONFINEMENT OF DOGS <br />BY PRIVATE CITIZENS; BY PROHIBITING DOGS IN CITY PARKS; <br />BY PROHIBIGINT THE KEEPING OF PUBLIC NUISANCES; BY <br />REQUIRING THAT ALL ANIMALS EXCEPT CATS BE PROPERLY <br />CONFINED IN SANITARY ENCLOSURES; BY PROHIBITING ABANDONMENT <br />OF DOGS AND CATS; BY ESTABLISHING NUMBER REGULATIONS <br />PERTAINING TO PETS; BY REQUIRING REMOVAL OF ANIMAL <br />WASTE; BY DECLARING FOUL AND OFFENSIVE ODORS A NUISANCE; <br />BY REQUIRING A REPORT BY PERSONS STRIKING DOMESTIC ANIMALS; <br />BY PROHIBITING THE KEEPING OF CERTAIN ANIMALS; BY <br />REQUIRING IMPOUNDMENT FACILITIES; BY PRESCRIBING DUTIES <br />OF ANIMAL CONTROL SUPERVISOR AND WARDENS; BY SETTING <br />IMPOUNDMENT FEES; BY PROVIDING FOR NOTIFICATION TO <br />OWNERS OF IMPOUNDED ANIMALS; BY SETTING TIME LIMITS <br />FOR KEEPING OF IMPOUNDED ANIMALS; BY ESTABLISHING <br />ADOPTION AND RECLAMATION PROCEDURES; BY ESTABLISHING <br />LICENSING REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES; BY SETTING LICENSE <br />FEES AND ESTABLISHING EXCEPTIONS; BY PROVIDING FOR THE <br />DENIAL OF A LICENSE; BY REQUIRING THE REPORTING OF RABID <br /> <br />I <br />