My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2006-128
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2000 s
>
2006
>
Res 2006-128
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2006 11:47:55 AM
Creation date
10/23/2006 9:05:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
Number
2006-128
Date
8/15/2006
Volume Book
168
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />150 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2006 - 128 R <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br />MARCOS, TEXAS, REAFFIRMING THE CITY'S OPPOSITION TO <br />REAL ESTATE PURCHASES BY THE TEXAS GENERAL LAND <br />OFFICE IN SAN MARCOS FOR THE PURPOSE OF LEASING FOR <br />PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT NOTICE OR APPROVAL BY <br />LOCAL TAXING ENTITIES; URGING THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL <br />LEAGUE TO SUPPORT LEGISLATION TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE; <br />AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />RECITALS: <br /> <br />1. The City of San Marcos has approximately 4,460.48 acres of public, tax exempt <br />properties, representing 25.1 % of all property within the City limits. <br /> <br />2. The Texas General Land Office (the "GLO") has purchased two tracts of prime <br />real estate in San Marcos (totaling over 600 acres) on behalf of the Permanent School Fund, and <br />the GLO is apparently considering leasing some of the property to private, commercial <br />enterprises for purposes of development. <br /> <br />3. Under the State Constitution and State Statutes, as interpreted by the Attorney <br />General in Opinion No. JM-1049 (1989), the state's interest in land is not taxable even when it is <br />leased for private commercial development, and the only interest in such land that is taxable is <br />the market value of the lease; and the market value of such leases is usually only a small fraction <br />ofthe market value of the land and improvements. <br /> <br />4. These actions by the GLO substantially remove property from the tax roll, <br />depriving cities, school districts and counties of property tax revenues they would receive were <br />the developments to be privately owned, and place extraordinary burdens on local governments <br />by requiring them to provide numerous services such as law enforcement, fire protection, public <br />education, and infrastructure maintenance without needed property tax revenues, and thereby <br />shift the cost for providing these services to existing taxpayers, including homeowners and <br />businesses. <br /> <br />5. In addition, these investments by the GLO could allow the GLO to determine <br />whether developers must comply with local development regulations, which could deprive <br />municipalities of the ability to ensure compatible land development within the city limits, and a <br />level playing field for developers, under local regulations. <br /> <br />6. The City Council adopted a resolution on June 6, 2006 opposing the purchase of <br />real property in San Marcos by the GLO for the purpose of leasing for private development, and <br />urging the Texas Municipal League to investigate the GLO's real property acquisition practices, <br />and the Texas Municipal League has responded by making contacts and arranging for and <br />attending meetings with key GLO personnel, including Jerry Patterson, Commissioner of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.