Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I Form 6f. Project Scoring Criteria <br /> <br />In the space below each of the scoring criteria, briefly describe how your project specifically <br />addresses each item, <br /> <br />Scoring Criteria (maximum total points: 100) <br /> <br />Maximum Points by Item <br /> <br />1. IdentIfied need/problem resolution -long term vs. short term................................... .15 <br />The long term goal of CAPCOG is to have permanent HHWC facIlities. To ensure the success <br />of thIS permanent HHW FacilIty and keep down disposal costs, a building is needed to distribute <br />reusable items to citizens <br /> <br />2. Technically feasible, ecologically sound project.....,..........................................., .15 <br />A re-use facility will lessen the need for HHW disposal by offering products to citizens that <br />would be purchasing these products anyway. <br /> <br />3. Regional coordinated effort...........................................................,.............. .20 <br />The City of San Marcos will make this HHWC facility available to residents of Hays County and <br />surrounding communities such as Buda, Kyle, Wimberley, Dripping Springs, Driftwood, Hays <br />City, Mountain City, and Woodcreek. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />4. Cost effecti veness of project. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 <br />Extremely cost effective to recycle items. Cost effective for the City -less disposal costs, and <br />cost effective for the citizens - free products. <br /> <br />5. Direct services vs. administrative overhead... ............ .......... .. ......... .. .. ..... .. ..........10 <br />Administrative overhead will be absorbed by the Public Works Department and should be <br />minimal compared to disposal costs. <br /> <br />6. SustainabIlity of proposed project.. . ............ ...... ... ...... .. . ... .. , ...... .. .. .. .., .. ........... ..10 <br />This same technique is being used currently at other HHWC facilities with great success <br /> <br />7. Local match directly related to project. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . , . , . . . . .. . .. . . .. . . ..5 <br />We are not matching any building costs but will pay for operating costs once the building is <br />operating and HazWhopper training <br /> <br />8. Innovative solution/approach...........,...........................,.........,......."............... .10 <br />Recycling is not a new approach to the solution of keeping hazardous waste down but a tried and <br />proven approach. <br /> <br />I <br />