My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ord 2007-028
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
02 Ordinances
>
2000 s
>
2007
>
Ord 2007-028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2015 10:11:38 AM
Creation date
5/16/2007 4:21:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Ordinances
City Clerk - Type
Adopting
Number
2007-28
Date
5/15/2007
Volume Book
171
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Purgatory Creek Area (Carson Tract) <br />Of the participants at Stakeholder Meeting #3, there was general agreement that large -scale <br />apartment complexes were undesirable in this location. In addition, the majority favored retaining <br />the existing commercial and industrial zoning primarily based on traffic concerns and a belief that <br />this area is generally inappropriate for residential development due to the floodplain and railroad <br />tracks. <br />A few participants at the meeting, as well as subsequent responses received from those unable to <br />attend the meeting, continue to favor a mixed -use traditional neighborhood development (TND) as <br />advocated by the Neighborhood Transportation Group. In addition, there continue to be those who <br />would favor the TND concept if they believed they could trust the City and the developer to <br />implement the concept appropriately. <br />As in past meetings, those favoring the TND option generally support the connection of Bishop and <br />Gravel Streets across Purgatory Creek and those favoring commercial and industrial development <br />oppose these connections. <br />New Housing in Existing Nei hborhoods <br />Although there is agreement that multi - family development is generally inappropriate within existing <br />neighborhoods, there is not a clear consensus on whether types of single- family housing other than <br />detached homes should be allowed. The primary concerns are increased traffic and the loss of the <br />existing neighborhood character. <br />Most participants at this meeting favored limiting new development in the existing neighborhoods to <br />detached single- family homes, while a minority would support a mixture of housing including <br />"granny flats ", single- family townhouses, and other types of housing limited to single- family <br />occupancy. Significantly, many who might otherwise support a variety of housing types cited the <br />City's inability to adequately enforce "Single-family only" restrictions as the primary reason they <br />could not support the concept. <br />Commercial Uses within Existing Nei hborhoods <br />The majority of participants oppose allowing small -scale "neighborhood commercial and office" <br />uses anywhere within existing neighborhoods due to it's potential impact on property values and <br />neighborhood character. However, a large minority believed that appropriately located and designed <br />neighborhood businesses could be beneficial to the neighborhood. It is clear that very few, if any, <br />stakeholders would support typical auto - oriented commercial within the existing neighborhoods. <br />Note: References to "existing neighborhoods" include the mostly developed areas in the Sector, <br />generally north of Purgatory Creek. <br />Sector One Stakeholders Meeting #3 Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.