Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ERM DRAFT January 16, 1996 :lob <br /> 14:46 pm <br /> Future Costs (through 5/3/97) - Based upon the Past Costs <br /> reflected on Exhibit A hereto, the Parties estimate that future <br /> costs of the Monitor wi~l not exceed $25,000.00 per month total. <br /> using that estimate, Plaintiff-Intervenors' individual maximum <br /> -- monthly liability is estimated to be as follows: <br /> Total Maximum Monthly COSt5 . . . . . . . . $ 25,000.00 <br /> State/s 1/3 Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,333.34 <br /> 1/2 of State's 1/3 Share . . . . . . . . . $ 4~166.67 <br /> 1/5 to New sraunfels/NBU . . . . . . . . . $ 833.34 <br /> 1/5 to San Marcos . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 833.34 <br /> 1/5 to GBRA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 833.34 <br /> 1/5 "to GVSUD/ARWSC . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 833.34 <br /> 1/5 to BexarMet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 833.34 <br /> The Parties acknowledge that these estimates are their "best <br /> guess, II made in good faith for purposes of evaluating Plaintiff- <br /> Intervenors' maximum exposure. , <br /> 3. conditions. This Agreement is subject to the following <br /> conditions: <br /> (a) this Agreement is accept~d and executed by all of <br /> the Parties; <br /> (b) the District court issues an order reallocating the <br /> state/s one-third share of the Monitor's costs as <br /> proposed by Pumper-Plaintiffs in their "suggestion <br /> for Reallocating the state~ 5 One-Third Share!' i <br /> (c) San Antonio does not appeal from the District Court <br /> order reallocating the state/s one-third share¡ and <br /> {d} the U.S. Court. of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit <br /> lifts its stay Order, dated October 1S, 1995, and <br /> -5- <br /> 9S/92'd tG:91 3~1 96-91-HBt <br />