Res 1996-116 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4.,1720 Federal Register I Vul. 48. ~o. 190 I Thursùay. Septcmucr ~9. 1983 I Notices fLIP .. . senerally stated in terms of property evaluation of sites containing material types are used by two contexts. types. for which dating techniques are still reconciling the goals will require The purpose of establishing bcing developed). - weighing the level of importance preservation goals is to set forth a "best 3. Identification. evaluation. assigned to each property type. The case" version of how properties in the registration and treatment activities degree to which integration of historic historic context should be identified. previously carried out for property types contexts must involve reconciling evaluated. registered and treated. in the historic context. property types may be limited by the Preservation goals should be oriented If a number of properties representing coordinated development of historic toward the greatest possible protection one aspect of a historic context have contexts used at various levels. of properties in the historic context and been recorded or preserved. treatment Integration with Management should be based on the principle that of additional members of that property properties should be preserved in place type may receive lower priority than Frameworks i - ssible. through affimiative treatment of a property type for which Preservation goals and: priorities are t ,ments like rehabilitation, no examples have yet been recorded or adapted to land units through = ilization or restoration. Generally. preserved. This approach ensures that integration with other plaiming ~~_.s will be specific to the historic the focus of recording or preserving all concerns. This integration must involve context and will often be phrased in elements of ths historic context is the resolution of conflicts that arise terms of property types. Some of these - retained. rather than limiting activities when competing resources occupy the goals will be related to information to preserving properties representing same land base. Successful resolution of needs previously identified for the only some aspects of the context. these conflicts can often be achieved historic context. Collectively, the goals The result of considering the goals in through judicious combination of for a historic context should be a light of these concerns will be a list òf inventory. evaluation and treatment coherent statement of program direction refined goals ranked in order of priority. activities. Since historic properties are covering all aspects of the context. lntegrating Individual Contexts- irreplaceable, these activities should be for each goal. a statement should be Creating the Preservation Plan heavily weighted to discourage the prepared identifying: When historic contexts overlap destruction of significant properties and 1. The goal. including the context and to be compatible with the primary land property types to which the goal applies geographically. competing goals and and the geographical area in which they priorities must be integrated for use. are located: effective preservation planning. The Recummended Sources of Technical 2. The activities required to achieve ranking of goals for each historic 'nformation the goal: context must be reconciled to ensure Resource Protection Planning Process. 3. The most appropriate methods or that recommendations for one context State and Plans Grants Division. 191?O, strategies for carrying out the activities: do not contradict those for another. This Washington. D.C. Available from Survey and 4. A schedule within which the important step results in an overall set Planning Brandt. Interagency Resources activities should be completed; and of priorities for several historic contexts D;,'ision. National Park Service. Department 5. The amount of effort required to and a list of the activities to be of the Interior. Washington. D.C. 2024û. accomplish the goal. as well as a way to performed to achieve the ranked goals. Outlines a step.by-step approach to evaluate progress toward its When applied to a specific geographical implementing the resource protection accomplishment. area. this is the preservation plan for planning process. that area. Resource Protection Planning Process Case Selling pdorities {or goals It is expected that in many instances Studies. Available from Survey and Planning Branch. Interagency Resources Division. Once goals have been developed they historic contexts will overlap i'ational Park Service. Department of the ~d to be ranked in importance. geographically. Overlapping contexts Interior. Washington. D.C- 20240. Reports 1king involves examining each goal are likely to occur in two prepared by State Historic Preservation ight of a number of factors. combinations-those that were defined Offices and other using the planning process. . General social. economic. political at the same scale (i.e.. textile Planning Theory, Andreas Faludi. 1980. and environmental conditions and development in Smithtown 18S0-1910 Oxford: Pergamon Press. Constructs a model trends affecting (positively and and Civil War in Smithtown 18'S5-18ïO of planning using concepts borrowed from negatively) the identification, and those defmed at different scales general systems theory. evaluation, registration and treatment of (i.e.. Civil War in Smithtown and Civil SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S property types in the historic context. War in the Shenandoah Valley). The STANDARDS FOR IDENTIFICATION Some property types in the historic contexts may share the same property context may be more directly threatened types. although the shared property Identification activities are by deterioration. land development types will probably have different levels undertaken to gather information about patterns. contemporary use patterns, or of importance. or they may group the historic properties in an area. The scope public perceptions of their value. and same properties into different property of these activities will depend on: such property types should be given types. reflecting either a different scale existing knowledge about properties: priority consideration. of analysis or a different historical goals for survey activities'developed in 2. Major cost or technical perspective. the planning process: and current considerations affecting the As previously noted, many of the management needs. identification. evaluation and treatment goals that the formulated for a historic Standard l. IdentIfication of Historic of property types in the historic context. context will focus on the property types Properties Is Undertaken to the Degree The identification or treatment of defined for that context. Thus it is Required To Make Decisions some property types may be technically critical that the integration of goals possible but the cost prohibitive; or include the explicit consideration of the Archival research and survey techniques may not currently perfected potential for shared property type activities should be designed to gather (for example, the identification of membership by individual properties. the information necessary to achieve submerged sites or objects. or the For example. when the same property defined preservation goals. The