Res 1996-116 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Federal Register I VoL 48; No. 190 I Thursday. September 29. 1983 I Notices 1'-/5 44723 the defined identification goals for the designing and carrying out community criteria: The criteria employed vary historic context(s): then the goals are surveys. depending on the inventory's use in adjusted accordingly. In addition. the The Process of Field Reseorch: Finol resource management. historic context narrative. the definition Report on the Blue fttdge Parkway Folklife of property types and the planning goals Project. American Folklife Center. 1981. Standard I. Evaluation of the Regional Sampling in Archeology. David for evaluation and treatment are all Hurst Thomas. University of California. SignIficance of Historic Properties Uses adjusted as necessary to accommodate Archeological Survey Annual Report. 1968-9. Established Criteria the new data. 11:87-100. The evaluation of historic properties Reporting Identification Results Remote Sensing: A Handbook for employs criteria to detennine which Archeologists and Cultural Resource Reporting of the results of Managers. Thomas R. Lyons and Thomas properties are significant. Criteria identification activities should begin Eugene Avery. Cultural Resource should therefore focus on historical, with the statement of objectives Management Division. National Park Service. architectural. archeological engineering prepared before undertaking the survey. u.s. Department of the Interior. 1977, and cultural values, rather than on Remote Sensing and Non-Destructive treatments. A statement of the minimum The repott should respond to each of the Archeology. Thomas R. Lyons and James L infonnation necessary to evaluate major points documenting: Ebert. editors. Remote Sensing Division. properties against the criteria should be 1. Objectives; Southwest Cultural Resources Center. 2. Area researched or surveyed: National Park Service. U.S. Department of the provided to direct information gathering 3. Research design or statement of Interior and University of New Mexico. 1978. activities. objectives; Remote Sensing Experimenls in Cultural Because the National Register of 4. Methods used, including the Resource Studies: Non-Destructive Methods Historic Places is a major focus of intensity of coverage. If the methods of Archeological Exploration. Survey and preservation activities on the Federal. differ from those outlined in the Analysis. Thomas R. Lyons. assembler. State and local levels. the National statement of objectives, the reasons reports of the Chaco Center. Number One. Register criteria have been widely National Pa,rk Service. U.S. Department of the should be explained. , Interior and University of New Mexico, 1978, adopted not only as required for Federal S. Results: how the results met the Sampling in Archeology, ¡ames W, Mueller. purposes. but for State and local objectives; result analysis. implications editor. University of Arizona Press. 1975. inventories as welL The National and recommedations: where the Tucson. Arizona. Historic Landmark criteria and other compiled infonnation is located. Scholars as Contractors, William I, Mayer- criteria used for inclusion of properties A summary of the surve-y results Oakes and Alice W. Portnoy. editors, in State historic site files are other should be available for examination and Cultural Resource Management Studies, U.S. examples of criteria with different Department of the Interior. 1979, distribution. Identified properties should Sedime."/tary Studies of Prehistoric management purposes. then be evaluated for possible inclusion Archeolagical Sites. Sherwood Gagliano, Standard II. Evaluàtion of Significance in appropriate inventories. Charles Pearson. Richard Weinstein. Diana Protection of infonnation about Wiseman. and Christopher McClendon. Applies the Criteria WithÏn Historic archeological sites or other properties Division of State Plans and Grants. National Contexts that may be threatened by Park Service. U.S. Department of the Interior. Properties are evaluated using a dissemination of that information is 1982. Washington. D.C. A,'ailable from historic context that identifies the necessary. These may include fragile Coastal Environments Inc.. 1260 Main Street. archeological properties or properties Baton Rouge. Louisiana 70802. Establishes significant patterns that properties and evaluates a method for employing represent and defines expected property such as religious sites. structures. or sedimentological analysis in -distinguishing types against which individual objects. whose cultural value would be site areas from non-site areas when properties may be compared. Within compromised by public knowledge of identifying submerged archeological sites on this comparative framework. the criteria the property's location. the continental shelf. for evaluation take on particular Recommended Saurces of Technical State Survey Farms. Available from meaning with regard to individual In{armation Interagency Resource Management Division~ National Park Service. Department of the properties. The Archealogical Sun'ey: Methods and Interior. Washington. D.G. 2D2.;{). Standard II!. Evaluation Results in A Uses. Thomas F. King. Interagency Characterizes cultural resource survey Archeological Services, U.S. Department of documentation methods in State Historic List or Inventory of Significant the Interior. 1978. Washington. D.G. Available Preserva tion Offices. Properties That Is Consulted In through the Superintendent of Documents. Truss Bridge Types: A Guide to Dating and Assigning Registration and Treatment U.S. Government Printing Office. Identifying. Donald C. ¡ackson and T. Allan Priorities Washington. D.C. 20402. GPO stock number Compo American Association for State and 024-O16-ûOO91. Written primarily for the non- Local History. 1977. Nashville, Tennessee. The evaluation process and the archeologist. this publication presents Technical leaflet ;;:95. Available from subsequent development of an inventor} methods and objectives for archeological AASLH. 708 BeITY Road. Ndshville. of significant properties is an on-going surveys. Tennessee 37204. Information about activity. Evaluation of the significance Cultural Resources Evaluation of the performing surveys of historic'bridges and of a property should be completed Northern Gulf af Jv(exica Continental Shelf. identifying the types of properties before registration is considered and National Park Service. U.S. Department of the encountered. Interior. 1977. before preservation treatments are Guidelines {or Local Surveys: A Basis {or Secretary of the Interior's Standards for selected. The inventory entries should Preservaûon Planning. Anne Derry. H. Ward Evaluation contain sufficient information for Jand!. Carol Shull and ¡an Thorman. National Evaluation is the process of subsequent activities such as Register Division. U.S. Department of the determining whethel" identified registration Ol" treatment of pl"operties. Interior. 1978. Washington. D.G. Available through the Superintendent of Documents. properties meet defined criteria of including an evaluation statement that U.S. Government Printing Office. significance and therefore should be makes clear the significance of the Washington. D.G. 20402. GPO stock number included in an inventory of historic property within one or more historic 024-{)16-0089-7. General guidance about properties determined to meet the contexts.