Laserfiche WebLink
38. <br />Regular Meeting August 25, 2003 Page 4 <br /> <br />change from R-1 to R-2. He stated the Zoning change from R-1 to R-2 would <br />change the setbacks from 20 ft to 15 ft. Mayor Habingreither asked if <br />anyone else wished to speak. No one did, so Mayor Habingreither closed <br />the public hearing. Ms. Narvaiz moved for adoption of the Zoning <br />Ordinance and Mr. Diaz seconded the motion. Mr. Montoya inquired why the <br />City would not grant a variance. Mr. O'Leary stated each of the 55 tracts <br />would have to request a variance. Ms. Narvaiz stated the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission approved this request 7 to 0. The Council then voted <br />unanimously for adoption of the Zoning Ordinance. <br /> <br />Mayor Habingreither introduced for consideration adoption of an Ordinance <br />on emergency, the caption which was read as follows: <br /> <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, <br />AMENDING ARTICLE 3, RESIDENTIAL CODE, FOR ONE AND TWO-FAMILY <br />DWELLINGS, OF CHAPTER 14, BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS, OF THE <br />CITY CODE BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 14.042, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR <br />SINGLE-FAMILY AND DUPLEX INDUSTRIALIZED HOUSING, AND ADDING A NEW <br />SECTION 14.043, ADOPTING ARCHITECTURAL LANDSCAPING REGULATION FOR ONE <br />AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS; INCLUDING PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS; PROVIDING <br />FOR PENALTIES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. <br /> <br />Mr. Thomaides moved for adoption of the Ordinance on emergency and Ms. <br />Narvaiz seconded the motion. Mr. O'Leary stated the proposed Ordinance <br />would regulate the industrial housing with state law to require 1) the <br />value of the home to be equal or greater than the median value of houses <br />within 500 feet, 2) compliance with all single-family zoning and <br />subdivision regulations, and 3) permanent foundations. He also stated <br />Staff has included other options the Council may want to consider <br />regulating 1) exterior features/architectural characteristics and 2) <br />minimum landscaping requirements, which would have to apply to both <br />modular and new stick built housing. Mr. Taylor inquired what exterior <br />features can be regulated. Carol Barrett, Director of Planning and <br />Development Services, stated the City can regulate the siding, roofing <br />materials, roof pitch and foundation fascia compatible with the single- <br />family dwellings located within 500 feet of the lot on which the <br />industrialized housing is proposed. She stated the proposed location must <br />be compatible with 51% of the single-family dwellings located within that <br />500-foot area and share an architectural style encompassing the exterior <br />features. Mr. Taylor inquired as to the downside of the exterior features. <br />Ms. Barrett stated the exterior feature regulations would affect the cost <br />and make it not feasible to buy a modular home. Mr. Taylor stated he is <br />for strict regulation on this issue because modular homes cost <br />construction workers jobs and violate deed restrictions. Ms. Barrett <br />stated there are some optional requirements in the Council packets. Mr. <br />Mihalkanin inquired if the Council amended the proposed Ordinance with the <br />optional requirements would it affect all homes. Ms. Barrett stated the <br />amendments may be applicable to all single-family dwellings, including <br />industrial housing. Mr. Taylor moved to amend by adding (b) (4) have <br />exterior siding or treatment, roofing materials, roof pitch, and -- <br /> <br /> <br />