Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 4 <br /> would be impossible as that information was not available. <br /> Next, we requested the total amount of income from 1968, when <br /> Perpetual Care became mandatory and the trust fund was set up. <br /> We were told that was impossible because of the amount of <br /> research required to look through all the audits. (There has <br /> been no separate cemetary account all this time, which would <br /> have made it quite simple to obtain this information.) <br /> So, we hoped some idea could be obtained by taking the <br /> total income from all sources for the last complete fiscal year, <br /> 1981-82. To this question, we got three different answers: <br /> $21,109.82 from Mr. williams office, by Miss Mattley; $l4,937 <br /> when Ms. Elwell asked Mr. Williams for the same information; <br /> and $l2,906 from the 1981-82 Audit report (p. 87) (Documenta- <br /> tion for these figures is in your envelope). Obviously these <br /> amounts are different. Mr. Williams suggested it was because <br /> they include different items, or cover a greater or lesser <br /> period of the fiscal year, 1981-82. This confusion all points <br /> up that we need a separate, cumulative account for all income <br /> and outgo for the cemetary, from all sources. It should not <br /> be this difficult to get such information. <br /> At a meeting of the Cernetary commission which Mr. Williams <br /> attended, he brought us copies of the status of the Trust Fund <br /> and the estimated revenues for 1982-83 (on the sheet marked <br /> "A" in your envelopes.) However, this sheet does not list any <br /> anticipated payments for Perpetual Care. <br />