Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 2 <br /> help from her assistant, Sharonn Brew, who served as our <br /> secretary. I also want to th ank Mr. Earl Williams for grant- <br /> ing me four interviews and one with his assistant, Miss Mattely, <br /> also for his coming to one of our Commission meetings to make <br /> a presentation. And last, but not least, I want to express my <br /> appreciation to the members of the Commission for their coopera- <br /> tion and support. <br /> Part II. The Present Situation <br /> Now to the background since 1961. <br /> Of course, the cemetary is much older than that, but I <br /> chose this date because I could find no data preceding it. We <br /> know there are problems with the cemetary--the question is why? <br /> Pretty much, they are problems of finance and record keeping. <br /> No one, as far as I could find, has any record of payments for <br /> lots preceding 1961, although there were, indeed, such payments. <br /> In 1961, it was decided to institute "Perpetual Care" <br /> payments, but this was not made mandatory until 1968. Those, <br /> who had already purchased lots were encouraged to buy perpetual <br /> care and 448 of them did between 1961 and 1968. In 1968, <br /> perpeutal care was made mandatory, and a Trust Fund agreement <br /> was passed by ordinance. A copy of the Trust Agreement appeared <br /> in The San Marcos Record on June 27, 1968; you will find a copy <br /> -- <br /> of it attached to this report. According to the trust, the <br /> income from the investment of the Trust Fund was to be used <br /> first to maintain the grave (s) of those who paid for perpetual <br />