11021983 Special Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

42 Special Meeting November 2, 1983 Page 3 Mr. Brown then moved to amend the Ordinance in Section 30-48 (e), and Ms. Kissler seconded the motion. The amendment was read into the record as follows: .. (e) The fee for the CRFEC will be charged to the customer: (1) at the time of the notification (as specified in Section 30-48 1 (a); (2) the charge will be based on an estimate of anticipated sewer- age usage derived by the Director of Public Works using avail- able information at his disposal; ( 3) after a twelve-month period has expired, a revised CRFEC bill will be derived based on the formula specified in (d) of this section; and, (4) if the customer overpaid, he will be refunded the amount overpaid. If the customer underpaid, any deficiency will be due to the City 10 days after final determination and notice of the amount of deficiency." The Council voted unanimous approval of the amendment. The Council then voted on approval of the Ordinance on second read- ing, as amended, and on roll call the following vote was recorded: AYE: Brown, Farr, Craddock, Kissler, Kreczmer. NAY: Guerra. ABSTAIN: None. Mr. Guerra said he would like the Council to consider an amendment at third reading to make provision for the citizens who could not afford more than $30,000 to $40,000 for a home. Lupe Carbajahl ad- vised the Council there were probably not more than 40 to 50 I1R-l" homes in this price range in San Marcos. Ms. Kissler stated she would like to see an amendment in Section 30-45 to add churches, service stations and travel trailers. Mr. Brown asked Mr. Head if there was any cost savings in doing all of the project at once rather than in increments, and Mr. Head said yes. Mr. Brown stated the Council should consider biting the bullet and going with the total project rather than waiting, as the City does not have an option whether or not to have a sewer treatment plant. Bill Harrison, the City's bond consultant, said there is a limitation to the certifi- cates of obligation that can be issued. He said the City could le- gally issue $5 million in straight revenue COso He reviewed amorti- zation schedules and timetables for $1 million and $5 million. Mayor Craddock introduced for consideration adoption of a Resolution, the caption which was read as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, CASTING VOTES FOR DIRECTORS OF THE HAYS COUNTY CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT FOR THE PER- IOD BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 1984 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR OF SAID CITY TO SUBMIT SAME TO THE COUNTY CLERK OF HAYS COUNTY.