Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Part TIT Hays Countv Thoroughfare r:an <br /> <br />Task 1 Collect ¿¡nd review existing data from previous <br /> .. <br /> transport<Jtion and l<Jnd use studies throughout the <br /> county. Incor()orated cities will be asked lor their <br /> input. D<Jta will include population, employment, <br /> land use, housing, dcve1opment plans, and financial <br /> history. <br />Task 2 Inventory existing streets and thoroughf<Jres outside <br /> San Marcos for their functional classificC1tion, <br /> volumes, and capacities. <br />TC1sk 3 Evaluate thoroughfare network for continuity, <br /> consistcnt capacity, compa ti bi li ty with growth and <br /> development pl,::¡ns-, elimination of bottlenecks, <br /> railroad conflicts, stream crossings, and <br /> coordination with adjacent county and SDlIPT <br /> progr<lms. <br />Task 4 Develop gro\.¡th forecasts. Forecasts of population <br /> and cm;Üoyment will be combined with devclop¡;;ent <br /> plans anct input [rom individual cities within the <br /> county. The items mentioned in Task 3 will be the <br /> prime considcr;ltions [or thoroughf;:.¡rc imrrovc¡;;cnt <br /> needs ~ithin the context of expected growth, ecor.om:.c <br /> development goals, and development plans. <br />Task 5 Dcter::1ine future thoroughfare improverr.ent needs for <br /> 1995 and 2000. Included will be roadw<1Y ¡:¡nd <br /> Ü¡terchange types, desirable cross sections, grade <br /> sc[Jarations, and levels of service. <br />Task G Update design st<lndards. Existing city, county, and <br /> SDHP':' standards will be reviewed. Compa ti bi li ty of <br /> !lays County with surrounding counties \áll be <br /> addressed ;:¡s well as staged development, set !.JJ.cks, <br /> cross sections, and right-of-wJ.Y. <br />'LJ:.>k 7 Develop the ThoL"OuC;:1[;Jre Pion based on current r.eeds. <br /> Cuture òem<1nc:, ca;1<1city st;u¡dörds and existi:1g P:è1r1S. <br /> :=ncluded w.i 1. 1. be 1995 è1nd 2COO needs, 1.:T.plemen::èltLo:; <br /> ¡-cspon:.>:L!J i.lity, [ilwllcing, cost effectiveness. è1:1 cl <br /> intC¡--èJLC:¡CY coordill;ltion. <br />Tè1sk 8 Develo¡1 costs i:, 1989 clollors exclusive of r i.gh::-o~- <br /> \.o.y. Unit cos::s u::;cd will re[Jresent <:l consensus fro;:] <br /> recent city, COU:lt)', SDrIPT, a:1¿ ùt:1C::- projects In the <br /> county. <br />T iJ S:( 9 Document t:.he d'-ltc, plCln, recommendations and prep;:¡rc <br /> a county thoroughfare plan map. A set of ca~;'.er,J.- <br /> ready originals of the report \\Ìll be presented to <br /> the coI;nty for reproduction and distribution os <br /> desired. <br /> J <br />