Laserfiche WebLink
<br />62 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Regular Meeting August 13, 1984 Page 4 <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Coddington then moved to deny the appeal and Mr. Farr seconded <br />the motion. On roll call the following vote was recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: Coddington, Farr, Kissler. <br /> <br />NAY: Craddock, Guerra. <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br /> <br />The motion failed for a lack of four votes. City Attorney Hankins <br />advised the matter could be reconsidered by the Council at the August <br />27, 1984 Council Meeting. Mr. Robbins was to provide the Council with <br />more information regarding this matter in the Councils' packets. <br /> <br />Mayor Craddock introduced for consideration approval of an Ordinance <br />on first reading, the caption which was read as follows: <br /> <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br />MARCOS, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE 1984-45, ADOPTED <br />SEPTEMBER 12, 1983, WHICH SET FORTH AN ITEMIZED ESTIM- <br />ATE OF THE EXPENSE OF CONDUCTING EACH ADMINISTRATIVE <br />UNIT OF THE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF SAID CITY FOR THE <br />FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1983, AND ENDING ON <br />SEPTEMBER 30, 1984, AND APPROPRIATED MONEY FOR THE <br />VARIOUS FUNDS AND PURPOSES OF SUCH ESTIMATE; TO REVISE <br />SAID ESTIMATES AND TO REAPPROPRIATE SAID FUNDS; ADOPT- <br />ING SAID REVISIONS AND ESTIMATES AND DECLARING AN EF- <br />FECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mayor Craddock moved for approval of the Ordinance on first reading <br />and Mr. Coddington seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Mayor Craddock introduced for consideration approval of an Ordinance <br />on first reading, the caption which was read as follows: <br /> <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br />MARCOS, TEXAS, AMENDING SECTION 2-73(b) (1) OF DIVISION <br />1 OF ARTICLE V. CODE OF ETHICS OF CHAPTER 2 OF THE CODE <br />OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS TO DELETE <br />THE PORTION OF SUCH SECTION WHICH PROHIBITS CITY OFFICERS <br />AND EMPLOYEES FROM REPRESENTING THEMSELVES AND OTHERS <br />BEFORE OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS, AGENCIES, COMMISSIONS OR <br />BOARDS; AMENDING SECTION 2-73(b) (3) OF SAID DIVISION OF <br />SAID ARTICLE OF SAID CHAPTER OF SAID CODE TO DELETE THE <br />PORTION OF SUCH SECTION WHICH PROHIBITS CITY OFFICERS <br />AND EMPLOYEES FROM REPRESENTING THEMSELVES AND OTHERS <br />IN MUNICIPAL COURT PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED BY CITY OF- <br />FICERS OR EMPLOYEES IN THE COURSE OF OFFICIAL DUTIES; <br />AMENDING SECTION 2-73 OF SAID DIVISION OF SAID ARTICLE <br />OF SAID CHAPTER OF SAID CODE TO DELETE SECTION 2-73(b) (5); <br />AMENDING SECTION 2-73 OF SAID DIVISION OF SAID ARTICLE OF <br />SAID CHAPTER OF SAID CODE TO ADD SUBSECTIONS (c), (c) (1) <br />AND (c) (2) TO ALLOW CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES TO REPRE- <br />SENT THEIR OWN INTERESTS IN OWNER-OCCUPIED HOMESTEADS <br />BEFORE OTHER CITY BOARDS, AGENCIES, COMMISSIONS OR DE- <br />PARTMENTS AND TO REPRESENT OTHERS BEFORE OTHER BOARDS, <br />AGENCIES, DEPARTMENTS OR COMMISSIONS IN MATTERS OF PURE- <br />LY CIVIC OR PUBLIC CONCERN WITHOUT COMPENSATION THEREFOR; <br />AMENDING SECTION 2-73 OF SAID DIVISION OF SAID ARTICLE OF <br />SAID CHAPTER OF SAID CODE TO ADD SUBSECTIONS (d), (d) (1) <br />AND (d) (2) TO PROHIBIT THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS <br />FROM REPRESENTING THEMSELVES OR OTHERS AND PROHIBITING <br />OTHER CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES FROM REPRESENTING <br />