|
<br /> 58
<br /> Regular Meeting January 27, 1986 Page 3
<br /> Mr. Guerra opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to
<br /> speak in favor or in opposition to the request. Noone did, so
<br /> Mr. Guerra closed the public hearing. Mr. Farr moved for approval
<br /> of the Ordinance on first reading and Mr. Coddington seconded the
<br /> motion, which passed unanimously.
<br /> Mr. Guerra introduced a public hearing and consideration of an Ordin-
<br /> ance on first reading, the caption which was read as follows:
<br /> AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
<br /> MARCOS, TEXAS, AMENDING SECTION 3 OF THAT ORDINANCE
<br /> WHICH REGULATES AND RESTRICTS THE LOCATION AND USE OF
<br /> BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES AND LAND, DATED JUNE 13, 1984
<br /> (VOL. 66) BY CHANGING THE ZONING OF LOTS 8, 9, 10, 11,
<br /> 12, 13 AND 14, B. G. COLLIER SUBDIVISION, A SUBDIVISION
<br /> IN THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, HAYS COUNTY, TEXAS AS SEOWN
<br /> ON THE ~ßP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 108, PAGE
<br /> 34, OF THE DEED RECORDS OF HAYS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND 0.135
<br /> OF AN ACRE OF LAND OUT OP AND A PART OF THE J. M. VERA-
<br /> XENDI LEAGUE, SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS,
<br /> AND BEING A PORTION OF TEAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND CON-
<br /> VEYED TO LEON R. KING BY DEED OF RECORD IN VOLUME 120,
<br /> PAGE 636 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF HAYS COUNTY, TEXAS,
<br /> FROM "M" (SINGLE, DUPLEX AND NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESSES
<br /> DISTRICT) TO "MP-3" (MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT); BY CHANG-
<br /> ING THE ZONING OF LOTS 6 AND 7, B. G. COLLIER SUBDIVISION,
<br /> A SUBDIVISION IN ThE CITY OF SAN lffiRCOS, HAYS COUNTY,
<br /> TEXAS, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN
<br /> VOLUME 108, PAGE 34 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF HAYS COUNTY,
<br /> TEXAS, AND 0.194 OF AN ACRE OF LAND OUT OF AND A PART
<br /> OF TEE J. M. VERAMENDI LEAGUE, SITUATED IN THE CITY OF
<br /> SAN MARCOS, TEXAS AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
<br /> TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO LEON R. KING BY DEED OF RE-
<br /> CORD IN VOLUME 210, PAGE 636 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF
<br /> HAYS COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM "M" (S INGLE, DUPLEX AND NEIGH-
<br /> BORHOOD BUSINESSES DISTRICT) TO "MF-4" (MULTI-FAMILY
<br /> DISTRICT), ALL or SAID TRACTS BEING LOCATED ON THE
<br /> NORTHWEST SIDE OF POST ROAD AND NORTH OF SPRING ROAD
<br /> IN THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS; AND DECLARING AN EF-
<br /> FECTIVE DATE.
<br /> Mr. Guerra opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to
<br /> speak in favor of the zoning request. Tom Watts representing the
<br /> owners of the property stated when the land was purchased it had an
<br /> "M" zoning and with the Zoning Ordinance adopted by the City in 1984,
<br /> they no lon~er had this zoning. He stated the City is experiencing
<br /> sewage difficulties that have affected their project. he stated the
<br /> Planning Cornnission had approved their land use and the Zoning Commis-
<br /> sion denied the "c" and'i\1F-5" requests but that Staff had advised
<br /> them MF-4 and MF-3 were appropriate. He stated there was a general
<br /> concern for the condition of Post Road but he does not personally
<br /> feel their project will affect the traffic of the area. He requested
<br /> consideration for MF-3 zoning for eighteen units to be built so they
<br /> could pursue their objectives. No one else wished to speak in favor
<br /> of the zoning request, so Mr. Guerra asked if anyone wished to speak
<br /> in opposition. L. E. Dupont read a letter of protest dated October 7,
<br /> 1985 into the record which was included in the Council's packet. he
<br /> read portions of a letter written by Dr. Glen Longley stating this de-
<br /> velopment would be a threat to the quality of water in the area. He
<br /> stated the neighbors were "pro-growth" as this sort of development
<br /> would appreciate their land but were not so interested in growth as
<br /> to allow Post Road to be more of a public safety factor. He stated
<br /> Post Road was a future Ben White (Austin). He pointed out to Council
<br /> 28.2% of owners within 200 feet of the property were protesting. No
<br />
|