My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01271986 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
1980 s
>
1986
>
01271986 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2007 10:01:40 AM
Creation date
12/2/2003 4:53:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
1/27/1986
Volume Book
76
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />64 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Regular Meeting January 27, 1986 Page 9 <br /> <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br />MARCOS, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT <br />TO THAT AGREEMENT OF JANUARY 28, 1985 BETWEEN SAID <br />CITY AND CHARLES WILLIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PROFES- <br />SIONAL SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH AN UPDATE OF THE <br />MASTER PLAN FOR THE SAN MARCOS MUNICIPAL AIRPORT TO <br />EXTEND THE TERM THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXE- <br />CUTE SAID AMENDED AGREEMENT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE <br />DATE. <br /> <br />Ms. Kissler moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Coddington <br />seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Mr. Guerra introduced for consideration adoption of a Resolution, the <br />caption which was read as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br />MARCOS, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING ITS COMMITMENT TO THE <br />LOOP PROJECT; AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE CREATION <br />OF A REGIONAL MOBILITY PLAN AND THE EXPENDITURE OF <br />$20,000.00 UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS; AND DE- <br />CLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Farr seconded <br />the motion. Mr. Robbins advised the Council the Parkway is being pre- <br />sented to the State Thursday, January 30, and a bus will be leaving <br />the Chamber of Commerce's parking lot between 8:30-8:45 a.m. Jim <br />Gandy advised the Council the County passed a Resolution supporting <br />the Parkway but designated no dollar amount. The Council voted unani- <br />mously for adoption of the Resolution. <br /> <br />Mr. Guerra introduced for consideration approval to accept request for <br />proposals for photogrammetric mapping services. Ms. Kisser moved for <br />approval and Mr. Farr seconded the motion. The Council instructed <br />more bidders b~ added to the three names provided to the Council and <br />Steve Jenkins advised two or three more could be added. Mr. Farr <br />directed CAPCO be contacted, as they may be able to provide addition- <br />al bidders names. On roll call the following vote was recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: Brown, Coddington, Farr, Guerra, Kissler. <br /> <br />NAY: Nicola. <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br /> <br />Mr. Guerra introduced a discussion by Rodney Cobb regarding the Fish <br />Hatchery property being designated as dedicated parkland and direction <br />to Staff for preparation of documents. Rodney Cobb advised the Council <br />the Parks and Recreation Board was requestinç the Council consider <br />designating this approximately three acre parcel of property as dedi- <br />cated parkland. The Chamber's Beautification Committee wants to fund <br />landscaping for the property but wants the City to designate it as <br />dedicated parkland prior to the landscaping. The Council directed <br />Staff to proceed with the necessary preparation for this designation. <br /> <br />Mr. Guerra introduced a discussion by George Boeker regarding capital <br />recovery fees. Mr. Boeker reviewed his memorandum to the Council <br />dated January 22, 1986 which was included in the Council's packet, <br />wherein he advised the Council the Public Works Department has re- <br />ceived a request to connect an existing residence, currently on a septic <br />tank, to our collection system. The question arises should the customer <br />be required to pay the capital recovery fee since the residence was in <br />existence prior to the effective date of the Ordinance requiring pay- <br />ment of capital recovery fees and the customer had been paying taxes <br />on the property. Mr. Boeker advised there were approximately eight <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.