Res 1986-004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

However 51% had problems with collections spilling or scattering trash or garbage and 27% found spilling and scattering to be a persistent problem. As concerns Brush pick up, 66% had experienced no problems while 43% had encountered problems on one or mo~ occ~slons. The Water service provided by the City received high marks with water quality being perceived as satisfactory by 77% of respondents. Only 37% of respondents had experienced pressure or flow problems. 59j% had never been without water for more than an hour while 23% had been without water at least once and 18% had been without water for two or more times. Ar the same time, water quality problems with 71% complaining of sediments, 16% citing temperature, 10% citing bad taste and 3% complains of bad odor. The loose animal problem was cited as the most pervasive problem with 81% having had problems with loose animals three times or more in the past year. Only 34% of respondents rated the Animal Control service as good with 66% rating the service as fair or poor. Standing water and poor drainage was perceived as a problem by a minority of respondents. 63% had had no problems with standing water in streets even after heavy rains, and 65% had not experienced drainage problems in off-street property. In looking at enforcement of zoning regulations, 51% felt that such regulations were not being effectively enforced while 37% indicated that they did not know. There was mixed reaction to the question of whether present city prodecures for charging the ~oning or use of property were fair and easy to comply with. A majority (51%) didn't know. Of those expressing -page 5-