Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Regular Meeting March 24, 1986 Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Farr asked why Mr. Durham wasn't notified, or why the neigh- <br />borhood wasn't notified, and Mr. Robbins replied that the Planning <br />Department didn't send out notifications for items like this one. <br />Mayor Craddock moved to grant the Specific Use Permit and add a <br />one year extention to the S.U.P. and Mr. Guerra seconded the mo- <br />tion which passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Mayor Craddock introduced for consideration a public hearing and <br />consideration of the appeal of Billy Kolander, President of BRYM, <br />Inc., licensee for the bar known as Footloose, located at 101 W. <br />San Antonio Street, from the decision of the Zoning Commission made <br />February 4, 1986, wherein the Zoning Commission imposed a 48-hour <br />closure of Footloose. Mayor Craddock declared the public hearing <br />open and asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of the appeal. Mr. <br />Lee Swift, attorney for BRYM,Inc. approached the podeum. He refered <br />to Mr. Robbins memo included in the packet. He said that Mr. Kolander <br />could not represent himself at the Zoning Commission meeting since Mr. <br />Robbins advised him his attendance would be unnecessary. Mr. Robbins <br />replied that he anticipated that the Zoning Commission would act on <br />the item accordingly since the resolution of the $1,000.00 bond issue <br />was at hand to be reviewed and discussed. He assumed that the draft <br />agreement would be sufficient information for the Zoning Commission. <br />Mayor Craddock asked if anyone wished to speak against the appeal, and <br />no one did. Mayor Craddock declared the public hearing closed. Mr. <br />Coddington moved to uphold the appeal and Mr. Guerra seconded the <br />motion. On roll call the following vote was recorded: <br /> <br />FOR: Coddington, Farr, Craddock, Guerra, Kissler, <br />Nicola <br /> <br />AGAINST: Brown <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Mayor Craddock introduced for consideration adoption of a Resolution, <br />the caption which was read as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MAR- <br />COS, TEXAS, APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A PRO- <br />POSED AGREEMENT BETWEEN SAID CITY AND B.R.Y.M., INC., PER- <br />TAINING TO THE APPROVAL BY THE ZONING COMMISSION OF SAID <br />CITY OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO B.R.Y.M.,INC. FOR THE OPERA- <br />TION OF A BAR KNOWN AS "FOOTLOOSE" IN SAID CITY TO ESTABLISH <br />AN ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE <br />POSTING OF A CASH BOND TO COVER APPROVED CLAIMS FOR PROPERTY <br />DAMAGE ARISING FROM THE OPERATION OF SAID BAR; AUTHORIZING <br />THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF SAID CITY; <br />AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. Farr moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Coddington <br />seconded the motion. Mr. Hankins made a notation in the agreement <br />that appeared to be in error and needed changing. He said that the <br />agreement needed to be between the City of San Marcos and B.R.Y.M., <br />Inc., and not between the Zoning Commission and B.R.Y.M.,Inc. Ms. <br />Kissler moved to amend the agreement in the first pagaraph and fourth <br />paragraph to delete the following from both paragraphs: The Zoning <br />Commission, and to insert in the fourth paragraph the following: <br />The City of San Marcos, and Mr. Brown seconded the motion which passed <br />unanimously on the amendment. The Council then voted unanimously for <br />adoption of the Resolution. <br /> <br />Mayor Craddock introduced for consideration a public hearing and <br />approval of an Ordinance on first reading, the caption which was <br />read as follows: <br />